Hello,
I believe that the answer is <span>B. Papal Supremacy</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Anti-Federalist Papers and explain how it supports your position on the ratification of the Constitution.
I am going to choose a quote from Anti-Federalist No. 3, "New Constitution Creates a National Government, Will not Abate Foreign Influence, Dangers of Civil War and Despotism," written by John Francis Mercer. It was published in the Maryland Gazette on March 7, 1788.
This is the quote:<em> "In a national government, unless cautiously and fortunately administered, the disputes will be the deeprooted differences of interest, where part of the empire must be injured by the operation of general law." </em>
That is why antideferalists heavily opposed the creation of a strong central government, as was the intention of Federalists such as Jhon Jay and Alexander Hamilton. I agree with antifederalists like Thomas Jefferson, who believed in a simpler form of government, not despotic, that granted rights to the citizens. These rights were established in the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States, drafted by federalist James Madison.
Answer:
Marcus leapt up to grab the kitten before the bicycle could hit it.
Explanation:
Because Marcus assumed the bycycle could hit it before it did. (sorry if this is wrong)
It is the last one they both served in the Mexican-American war
Answer:
If they lacked a written language they wouldn't have the ability to document the trade/deal etc.
Explanation: Incase the other person decides to do something deceitful like break one of the rules of the trade conducted,Ancient people would need evidence that they signed and agreed to the deals' rules. Since Most couldn't read or write in ancient times, They created the cylinder seal to give evidence of the deal taking place, either that or they would have scribes write out most of it for the peope conducting the trade etc.
