Why did some people oppose internment camps during world war 2?

1 answer:

5 0

The best answer is, D. the camps held people who had done nothing wrong.

The Japanese Internment camps established in the United States as a response to the attack on Peral Harbor by the Japanese was a drastic action taken by the government and military and not supported by everyone. Some Americans, including those in government, where weary of using the internment camps to house Japanese-Americans because they were being held there, against their will, even though they had nothing wrong.

You might be interested in

Anti Jewish feelings and violence increased after what eleventh century event

Lana71 [14]

It increase in the process of the black plague or black death because everyone though it was punishment from god for killing Jesus which the Jewish were the ones that did it so they started killing them

8 0

3 years ago

How can economies of scale be achieved through vertical integration? (economies of scale, vertical integration, corporation)

yawa3891 [41]

Vertical integration gives a company better economies of scale. Large companies employ economies of scale when they are able to cut costs while ramping up productions—they take advantage of their size. ... This increases supply, lowers fixed and variable costs per unit, and makes a product more attractive to consumers.

6 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HALP

Olenka [21]

Answer:

1: Sam Houston

2:Mirabeau Lamar

3: Chief Bowles

4:Jose Antonio Navarro

5: William Goyens

6: Anson Jones

7: Edwin Moore

8: Jack Coffee Hays

9: Mary Maverick

10: Stephen F Austin

Explanation: I Just realized my teacher had this think where I put the answer I think it is in a spot and got them all right. I hope this helped!!!

5 0

3 years ago

Would the U.S government be better if it were a more direct democracy?

blagie [28]

Answer:

I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.

This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.

I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.

Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.

Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...

3 0

3 years ago

Do you believe that violence against an unjust government is acceptable why or why not

viva [34]

no because some things should not be met with violence

8 0

4 years ago