1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zheka24 [161]
3 years ago
12

Why were joint-stock companies created?

History
2 answers:
Alla [95]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Joint-stock companies were created for two main reasons:

-Its main motivation is to limit the responsibility of the partners of the companies only to the percentage of shares that they own. In this way, investors are protected from possible lawsuits, making them responsible only for the part that belongs to them as owners of the shares.

-In addition, another motivation is to facilitate the investment of private capital, since investors do not have to directly buy a percentage of the company, but the shares are negotiable by themselves. This makes them have a commercial value, which if it increases increases the valuation and investment that the company receives.

Ray Of Light [21]3 years ago
5 0

<em><u>Joint-stock companies created by the British Government to establish their settlement in the new world.</u></em>  

Further Explanations:

The terms were first coined by the British and were also able to spread its colonies. By the 17th century, they were able to colonize most of the Europe and America. The companies were the charters granted by King James I during 1606.companies funded by private investors. These companies became an important aspect of the colonization of “New World”.

These companies were set up by the shareholders or the investor who has invested capital in the company and in return gets the shares from the profit of the company. The Crown was willing to risk its capital in the ventures of overseas exploration that was funded by private investors. These companies were vital in the colonization of newly founded nations. Without Joint-stock companies, Britain would never be able to establish those  13 colonies in the United States.

Learn more

  1. The impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the supreme court. throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards. create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty? <u>brainly.com/question/637963 </u>
  2. Central and state governments influence each other in?<u>brainly.com/question/462208 </u>
  3. According to the supreme court, which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in Edwards v. South Carolina?<u>brainly.com/question/2419144</u>

Answer Details

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Joint-stock

Keywords: Joint-stock, British ,companies, private ,investors, shareholders, Joint-stock, colonization , New World, British, colonize, Europe ,America.

You might be interested in
How did companies respond to government efforts to regulate business?
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

3.They looked for and used loopholes in the law.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The Pacific Railroad _______________ a. was something most territories did not want on their land. b. helped small, isolated com
Sphinxa [80]

c . opened up frontiers and changed economic l

8 0
3 years ago
The Thirteenth Amendment outlaws....
Maslowich
The Thirteenth Amendment outlaws "slavery and involuntary servitude" except in the cases of punishment for a crime. This was added to the Constitution after the Civil War, which was fought primarily over the issue of slavery. 
6 0
3 years ago
What completes these sequence events?
Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

After the Senate passes the bill, the President has the ability to veto it or sign it into a law

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A major concern of the Antifederalists was that a too- strong central government would ___.
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

. Weaken state power

Explanation:

Anti-federalist was a political movement that advocated for preventing the central government from having too much power.

The supporters of the anti-federalist believed that earlier draft of the constitution was created to maintain a healthy balance between the federal government and the independent states that can regulate their own matters.

If the power of federal government was increased, Anti-federalists believe that  the feds will have more chance to limit / overturn the decisions made by the states. As a result, the states will be weakened and gradually lost its independency.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was a severe downturn in oil prices during the early '80s detrimental to the Soviet economy? It was an oil-exporting nation.
    10·1 answer
  • Which pull factor contributed to the population growth shown in the urban area of northern Illinois and Indiana?
    9·2 answers
  • He did not want to serve in WWI because he thought taking a human life was wrong and violated the teachings of the bible, "thou
    5·1 answer
  • In 1998, two years after signing the Dayton Accords, Serbia
    14·2 answers
  • What are natural rights?
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HURRY WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO FIRST PERSON
    5·2 answers
  • Analyze the ways in which British imperial policies between 1763 and 1776
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true regarding the office of the president?
    15·1 answer
  • What are three effects that nationalism can have?
    6·1 answer
  • 11. What US Battleship is undefeated?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!