Answer:
Achievement
Explanation:
According to psychology, our behavior is motivated by different things and we all have different motivations for our behaviors. Therefore, two individuals can have the same behavior but be motivated by different factors.
One of the needs is the need for achievement and it refers to the desire to achieve a significant accomplishment and showing high-standards in a task by mastering the skills needed to do this task. In other words, it's the need to accomplish a task that is perceived as difficult.
In this example, Rodrigo enjoys being able to complete a difficult job successfully and accomplishing tasks which require skill and effort. We can see that he feels the need to accomplish a task that are perceived by himself (or others) as difficult by mastering skills. Therefore, we can see that he is motivated by Achievement needs.
Answer:
Property rights and obligations
Explanation:
Individuals and firms have a moral responsability to respect property rights. This is because the right to private property is not only a legal right, but a natural right, the word natural here meaning that it is right that people have because they are human beings.
This is the reason why individuals and organizations must respect intellectual property. Intellectual property is like any other type of property even if its not physical. It is subject to the same moral dimension.
Not true, each religion has a different meaning. Each religion supports something, not always the samething.
The correct answer is the plow. When the plow was invented agriculture was made much easier which enabled people to settle around and make surplus of food. This enabled them to trade with others and increase the size of the cities and the rest is history.
Answer:
Harry was incorrect, and Samantha can be held liable for direct patent infringement
Explanation:
In the court of law it is difficult to prove that Samantha did not know that the earlier patent existed. As, far as the court knows she made a comb which was identical to the one of the patent.
She would not be able to sell the rest of her inventory she would be held guilty of infringing the patent whether she had known or not known.
So, Harry's statement was wrong.
