how each of these "w"? im guessing it means work. and three weapons from then that are "new"? are:
Rifles. All nations used more than one type of firearm during the First World War. The rifles most commonly used by the major combatants were, among the Allies, the Lee-Enfield .303 (Britain and Commonwealth), Lebel and Berthier 8mm (France), Mannlicher–Carcano M1891, 6.5mm (Italy), Mosin–Nagant M1891 7.62 (Russia), and Springfield 1903 .30–06 (USA). The Central Powers employed Steyr–Mannlicher M95 (Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria), Mauser M98G 7.92mm (Germany), and Mauser M1877 7.65mm (Turkey). The American Springfield used a bolt-action design that so closely copied Mauser’s M1989 that the US Government had to pay a licensing fee to Mauser, a practice that continued until America entered the war.
Machine guns. Most machine guns of World War 1 were based on Hiram Maxim’s 1884 design. They had a sustained fire of 450–600 rounds per minute, allowing defenders to cut down attacking waves of enemy troops like a scythe cutting wheat. There was some speculation that the machine gun would completely replace the rifle. Contrary to popular belief, machine guns were not the most lethal weapon of the Great War. That dubious distinction goes to the artillery.
Flamethrowers. Reports of infantry using some sort of flame-throwing device can be found as far back as ancient China. During America’s Civil War some Southern newspapers claimed Abraham Lincoln had observed a test of such a weapon. But the first recorded use of hand-held flamethrowers in combat was on February 26, 1915, when the Germans deployed the weapon at Malancourt, near Verdun. Tanks carried on a man’s back used nitrogen pressure to spray fuel oil, which was ignited as it left the muzzle of a small, hand-directed pipe. Over the course of the war, Germany utilized 3,000 Flammenwerfer troops; over 650 flamethrower attacks were made. The British and French both developed flame-throwing weapons but did not make such extensive use of them.
there are many more, but here are 3 i found from a trustworthy source!
Answer:
A) Prepaying the debt would cause the firm's debt-to-equity ratio to improve from .62 to .50.
Explanation:
The computation of the impact is as follows:
The Debt equity ratio is
= Total liabilities ÷ total equity
Now
Debt equity prior to payment is
= $16,000,000 ÷ $26,000,000
= 0.62
And,
Debt equity after payment is
= $13,000,000 ÷ $26,000,000
= 0.50
So here as we can see that the debt equity would be improved from 0.62 to 0.50
Therefore the correct option is a.
Answer: Mm mjuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh
Explanation: Mm mjhuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh
Explanation:
The journal entry is as follows
Notes receivable A/c Dr $11,100
To Sales A/c $11,100
(Being the sales is recorded)
Since the merchandise transaction is done through note receivable so we debited the note receivable account and the transaction is of sale type so the sales account is credited. Both the transactions are recorded at $11,100
Answer:
(C) Bonds Payable for $150,000
Explanation:
the face value of the bonds will the value at which bonds payable account enter the accounting. Then, there is a discount which decrease the net value of the bonds:
Bonds Payable 150,000 credit
Discount on bonds 15,000 debit
When the bonds are converted, we will write-off these account against common stock and additional paid-in
To wirte-off the account we need to post them in the other side so we got:
Bonds payable debit 150,000 debit
Discount on bonds 15,000 credit
Common Stock xx credit
Additional paid.in xx credit
These makes option C correct
