Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
W =<u> P - 2L </u>
2
Step-by-step explanation:
perimeter P = 2L + 2W
P - 2L = 2W
W =<u> P - 2L </u>
2
Answer:
f= -(6/5)g
Explanation:
We have been given the expression 6f+9g = 3g+f
Solve for f means find the value of f
We will simplify the given expression:
we will collect the values of f at one side and g on the other side
So, rewriting the given expression 6f+9g =3g+f as 6f-f=3g-9g
So, after simplification it will lead to 5f= -6g
After further simplification f= -(6/5)g which is the final result
Its <span>If Kevin and Amanda continue to train until week 16, what will their times be? 6. Do you believe a linear model best represents the relationship of the time of the runners and the weeks that passed?(Hint: look at question 5). What do you think this says about problems in the real world? Justify your thoughts in 3-4 sentences. </span> cause they are talking about minutes and per miles
Correction:
Because F is not present in the statement, instead of working onP(E)P(F) = P(E∩F), I worked on
P(E∩E') = P(E)P(E').
Answer:
The case is not always true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the odds for E equals the odds against E', then it is correct to say that the E and E' do not intersect.
And for any two mutually exclusive events, E and E',
P(E∩E') = 0
Suppose P(E) is not equal to zero, and P(E') is not equal to zero, then
P(E)P(E') cannot be equal to zero.
So
P(E)P(E') ≠ 0
This makes P(E∩E') different from P(E)P(E')
Therefore,
P(E∩E') ≠ P(E)P(E') in this case.
