I think it would be right to peacefully assemble because we mostly know the first amendment is right to speech, religion, etc., but with the right to speech you could peacefully "speak" your opinion.
Answer: the Roman Republic had a system of checks and balances
Explanation: just answered this question correctly
Through the many wars and peace congresses of the 18th century, European diplomacy strove to maintain a balance between five great powers: Britain, France, Austria, Russia, and Prussia. At the century’s end, however, the French Revolution, France’s efforts to export it, and the attempts of Napoleon I to conquer Europe first unbalanced and then overthrew the continent’s state system. After Napoleon’s defeat, the Congress of Vienna was convened in 1814–15 to set new boundaries, re-create the balance of power, and guard against future French hegemony. It also dealt with international problems internationally, taking up issues such as rivers, the slave trade, and the rules of diplomacy. The Final Act of Vienna of 1815, as amended at the Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle (Aachen) in 1818, established four classes of heads of diplomatic missions—precedence within each class being determined by the date of presentation of credentials—and a system for signing treaties in French alphabetical order by country name. Thus ended the battles over precedence. Unwritten rules also were established. At Vienna, for example, a distinction was made between great powers and “powers with limited interests.” Only great powers exchanged ambassadors. Until 1893 the United States had no ambassadors; like those of other lesser states, its envoys were only ministers.
Answer:
I would right something like
Explanation:
The married citizen goes to a diffrent state or village and then the emperor finds her there then she goes back to her village and add some more details then in the end they become friends.
let me know if this did I really want brainliest and 100 pts.
Answer:
ok so the first one is the supremacy clause (that's not all of article 6, it says more about states rights). it means that any laws on the national level trump the ones on the state level.
the second one is the 10th amendment, which says that states can do whatever isn't prohibited by the constitution (and other amendments), not just what is specifically said they can do.
this basically shows the power balance between the national government and states government. the national government is always supreme over state governments, but state governments still do stuff. that's what federalism is.
