Answer:
The concept or argument of this States’ Rights advocates of states’ rights has placed a much greater belief and confidence in decentralized or regional governments than that of the centralized government. According to their arguments, state governments, regional government are more proactive, responsive, concerned and has that popular control, more sensitive to local issues and problems, and of course they have more understanding of their culture and values which the state’s upholds. Some the reason for the argument about centralized system of government being bad is as follows:
1) Remote control
The organization’s executives are under tremendous pressure to formulate decisions for the organization, and they lack control over the implementation process. The failure of executives to decentralize the decision-making process adds a lot of work to their desk
2) Bureaucratic leadership
Centralized management resembles a dictatorial form of leadership where employees are only expected to deliver results according to what the top executives assigned them. Employees are unable to contribute to the decision-making process of the organization, and they are merely implementers of decisions made at the higher level.
(Hint: Random drug tests of students involved in extracurricular activities do not violate the Fourth Amendment.)
In Veronia School District v. Acton (1995), the Supreme Court held that random drug tests of student athletes do not violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures. Some schools then began to require drug tests of all students in extracurricular activities. The Supreme Court in Earls upheld this practice.
Answer:
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government' programs and services.
Explanation:
This not my work so please do not give me any credit for it
