1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Softa [21]
2 years ago
11

Why is DNA profiling not more commonly used in criminal investigations?

Law
1 answer:
eimsori [14]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. ... In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Most crimes are those of
V125BC [204]

Most crimes are those of C. omission meaning one must make a truly voluntary act to be found guilty.

<h3>What is a Crime?</h3>

This refers to the act or action of engaging in an activity that is prohibited and is outlawed by the laws of a place.

Hence, we can see that based on the fact that most crimes are crimes of omission, which means that because a person failed to perform his legal duty, then one must make a truly voluntary act to be found guilty.

Read more about crimes of omission here:
brainly.com/question/27230467

6 0
2 years ago
Stalking and instances of domestic violence are considered federal criminal acts when _____.
weqwewe [10]

Answer:

violence (or abuse) is involved?

stalking isnt really a federal crime since there is no violence involved. unless there is and that would count as a federal crime.

source(s)

https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ovw/172204.pdf

8 0
2 years ago
Identify 2 purposes of the Court Systems
Wewaii [24]
Courts exist to do justice, to guarantee liberty, to enhance social order, to resolve disputes, to maintain rule of law, to provide for equal protection, and to ensure due process of law.
7 0
3 years ago
Do you agree that the states should have to provide a lawyer to someone accused of committing a serious crime?
spayn [35]

Answer:

Yes I agree that a lawyer should be provide for someone accused of committing a serious crime. I agree because they are being ACCUSED it doesn't mean that they have committed that crime that is why they need someone to fight for them.

Explanation:

sorry if i am wrong

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why you reasoned that it is related to Baum's or UNIDO?
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

United Nations industrial development organization

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does a well-implemented safety and health program effect employee retention?
    9·1 answer
  • What should you do when making a personal appeal to a procrastinator to change his/her work habits? A. Use examples of how you w
    15·1 answer
  • What is copyright? Give me a good and understandable expl. and I'll mark you brainliest
    13·1 answer
  • Hola tengo 15 años y mi novio 16 no somos novios publico todavia tengo un problema y quisiera que me dieran un consejo que puedo
    9·1 answer
  • Why has it been important to keep natural habitats such as the Great Plains free from wildfires?
    9·2 answers
  • Free brainlyest....................
    10·2 answers
  • Homicidal Poisoning: Angels of Death
    5·1 answer
  • Which act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly?
    5·1 answer
  • How can countries adapt to population decline?
    9·1 answer
  • When parking a pill in a car with a manual transmission you should park with the transmission in
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!