Answer:
i cant see the options. but you need to remember that traveling was hard back then so they looked for settlements that have good food source and clean water sources.
Freedom of Speech & Freedom of press ... the first Amendment
Answer:
The option which weaken the conclusion drawn is:
E. All artists who receive grants and donations are completely dependent on that money to cover their daily expenses; without those funds, they would have to discontinue the practice of their art.
Explanation:
The conclusion drawn in the passage is that grants and donations are a bad things because they actually make artists lose the interest for work. The passage claims that artists only practice art because they need to survive.
<u>The option that weakens that conclusion is the one that goes against it. In that case, we should choose letter E, since it claims the opposite. It states that artists need the money they receive in the form of grants and donations. If they cannot cover their expenses, they cannot work. If grants and donations help them cove their expenses, they are able to work. Therefore, letter E is the best option.</u>
The correct answer is Luminous
Explanation: The mosaics have a very old origin. They were already called mosaics in Crete, Mesopotamia and, as we know, in Greece and Rome.
The Romans built the mosaics with small cubic pieces called tessela. The materials of these tesserae were limestone, stained glass, ceramic.
Paleo-Christian art, now able to enjoy greater financial bases and relegating fresco mural painting to the background, will seek to perfect the technique and will toast the interior of the church with intense and vibrant color images, possible by replacing marble with pieces of colored glass . However, this new material does not allow a complex palette of shades and the modeling of the figures loses their contact with the real world, the characters present themselves as transcendental, immaterial beings, inhabitants of a kingdom of light and gold.
Answer and Explanation:
The Supreme Court concluded that the plaintiffs (black children) have been denied their rights because, by segregating them from white children, the state laws that legitimized such segregation and established different public schools for white and black children, contravenes the Fourteenth Amendment which guarantees equality and equal protection of the law.
