Provide help to any questions about; college, metal health, personal issues, and anything that you need help with. They should be private conversations and a place you can go to whenever you need help with anything.
<span>The decision was compromise.
</span><span>My grandmother was distraught over the death of my grandfather.
</span><span>That actor can enthrall any audience with his performance.
</span>
Answer:
In forms of a liquid surface water, ice and under ground flow.
Explanation:
The hydrosphere is a sphere f the water cycle that operates in a systematic manner form the evaporation in the surface water from lakes and river and seas to the condensation and then precipitation over the surface again in snow, hail or rain and which is absorbed by plants and trees is given out by the leaf pores and the moisture on soil is infiltrated by pores and forms underground aquifers and this comes out to join the streams and again joins the ocean system.
Answer:
a) Potential Sources of confounding:
1) Pancreatic cancer patients were being compared with persons hospitalized for cancerous diseases. Coffee may likely aggravate the pains of pancreatic cancer patients unlike other cancer patients because the latter's cancer diseases were not digestive.
2) Unintended bias was introduced by investigators in questioning patients. The investigators asked questions on coffee drinking habits of those already hospitalized. This biased the drinking of coffee as a predisposing factor.
3) There could be differences among men and women because of other habits. While drinking more coffee predisposed women to cancer, according to the confounding statements, drinking even more did not have much difference in men.
Explanation:
"CRITICS SAY COFFEE STUDY WAS FLAWED" was an article in New York Times written by Harold M. Schmeck Jr. on June 30, 1981. It attempted to critique the study of drinking coffee and its disposal to cause cancer to the drinkers.
In this article, he introduced the views of critics of the Coffee Study which was earlier published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the accompanying refutal by the researchers.