Answer:
The correct answer is A. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.
Explanation
The difference between Andrew Jackson’s address to the Congress and Michael Rutledge’s “Samuel’s Memory” is clearly writing techniques and the use of language. Jackson’s sentences are long and very often not really to the point, which makes him sound very intelligent and believable. On the other hand, Rutledge uses short and simple sentences that are straight to the point.
<span>black institutions, illustrating that segregation was common in the North</span>
346.5 acres (0.54 sq mi; 140.22 ha)
<span>1,966.5 acres (3.07 sq mi; 795.81 ha) - wiki</span>
Hello. You forgot to mention that this question is about the article "9/11/2001" by Mike Kubic. Also, you forgot to mention that part A, shows that the word "haunt" as used in the 20th paragraph, refers to a place where a specific group of people is concentrated.
Answer:
A “proved to have deep roots”
Explanation:
In paragraph 20 of the article, we can see that despite the campaigns and efforts of different countries to combat and eliminate terrorist attacks provoked by radical Islamist groups, these groups have survived, huddled in the Middle East. This shows how these groups have deep roots, being able to establish themselves strongly in one place, which shows the difficulty in controlling and decimating this threat everywhere on the planet.
