Buying goods and services not for their intrinsic value but for the purpose of impressing others is called Conspicuous consumption.
What is Conspicuous consumption?
Conspicuous consumption is the act of acquiring things or services specifically with the intention of flaunting one's wealth. When publicly displayed products and services are too expensive for other people in a person's class, conspicuous consumption is a way to demonstrate one's social position. Although it is frequently associated with the wealthy, this type of consumerism can occur in any income class.
Conspicuous consumption is characterized by buying products that are solely intended to serve as symbols of wealth, such as apparel with luxury brand labels, cutting-edge equipment and toys, and automobiles.
To know more about Conspicuous consumption refer:
brainly.com/question/7456315
#SPJ4
This individual has experienced structural mobility
Structural mobility:
It happens when societal changes enable a whole group of people to move up or down the social class ladder. Structural mobility is attributable to changes in society as a whole, not individual changes.
In the first half of the twentieth century, industrialization expanded the U.S. economy, raising the standard of living and leading to upward structural mobility. In today’s work economy, the recent recession and the outsourcing of jobs overseas have contributed to high unemployment rates. Many people have experienced economic setbacks, creating a wave of downward structural mobility.
When analyzing the trends and movements in social mobility, sociologists consider all modes of mobility. Scholars recognize that mobility is not as common or easy to achieve as many people think. In fact, some consider social mobility a myth.
What is structural social mobility ?
The concept of structural social mobility refers to change in the social position of many people due to changes in society itself.
Learn more social mobility :
brainly.com/question/26717828
#SPJ4
- It should be noted that the failure to vaccinate some children isn an external cost. [See the attached graph]
- The social cost curve is also indicated accordingly.
- From an efficiency perspective, subsidizing vaccines <em>does</em> make sense because, without the subsidy, the equilibrium quantity is <em>less</em> than the socially optimal quantity.
- The school nurse suggests publishing a list of which kids did not get a flu vaccine, in the hope that public shaming will lead people to vaccinate their children. The school nurse is hoping that social norms will act like a <em>punishment </em>and lead the market to a<em> socially efficient </em>
- The flaws that the school nurse's suggestion have are:
- People that feel passionate about not vaccinating are typically doing so for medical or religious reasons and will not sway to social norms or peer pressure. (Option B)
- The school would potentially face a lawsuit because sharing protected health information (PHI), like immunization records, without parents' consent could be a violation depending on the regulations of the state. (Option C)
<h3>What is social Cost?</h3>
In neoclassical economics, the social cost is the total of the transaction's private costs plus the costs imposed on consumers as a result of being exposed to the process for which they are not rewarded or taxed.
In other words, it is the total of internal and external expenses.
Learn more about social cost:
brainly.com/question/28116338
#SPJ1
Answer:
16%
Explanation:
Calculation for the margin that Auagaa474 needed to earn in order to achieve an ROI of 27.2%
First step is to calculate the Turnover using this formula
Turnover = Sales ÷ Average operating assets
Let plug in the formula
Turnover= $491,300 ÷$289,000
Turnover=1.7
Now let calculate the margin using this formula
ROI = Margin × Turnover
Let plug in the formula
27.2% = Margin × 1.7
Margin = 27.2% ÷ 1.70
Margin=0.16*100
Margin= 16%
Therefore the margin that Auagaa474 needed to earn in order to achieve an ROI of 27.2% will be 16%
One-Product<span> Companies. i belive
</span>
