There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
Answer:
How central ideas connect
Explanation:
The pilgrims landed on the coast of the USA at what is now known as Cape Cod. They started exploring the area and came across a deserted Native American Villiage. The pilgrims then found a stockpile of corn buried in wicker baskets under the sand. It was apparently the Indian villagers' seed stock for the summer. They moved inland during the winter and came back to the coast during the summer. The pilgrims dug up all the corn and took it back to the ship with them
