1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
FrozenT [24]
3 years ago
11

How did the fugitive slave law serve to strengthen the south? Pls tell me

History
1 answer:
LenaWriter [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The Fugitive Slave Acts were a pair of federal laws that allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1793, the first Fugitive Slave Act authorized local governments to seize and return escaped slaves to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their flight. Widespread resistance to the 1793 law led to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which added more provisions regarding runaways and levied even harsher punishments for interfering in their capture. The Fugitive Slave Acts were among the most controversial laws of the early 19th century. Statutes regarding refugee slaves existed in America as early as 1643 and the New England Confederation, and slave laws were later enacted in several of the 13 original colonies. Among others, New York passed a 1705 measure designed to prevent runaways from fleeing to Canada, and Virginia and Maryland drafted laws offering bounties for the capture and return of escaped slaves.

By the time of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, many Northern states including Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut had abolished slavery.

Concerned that these new free states would become safe havens for runaway slaves, Southern politicians saw that the Constitution included a “Fugitive Slave Clause.” This stipulation (Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3) stated that, “no person held to service or labor” would be released from bondage in the event they escaped to a free state. Despite the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause in the U.S. Constitution, anti-slavery sentiment remained high in the North throughout the late 1780s and early 1790s, and many petitioned Congress to abolish the practice outright.

Bowing to further pressure from Southern lawmakers—who argued slave debate was driving a wedge between the newly created states—Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793.

This edict was similar to the Fugitive Slave Clause in many ways, but included a more detailed description of how the law was to be put into practice. Most importantly, it decreed that slave owners and their “agents” had the right to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states.

In the event they captured a suspected slave, these hunters had to bring them before a judge and provide evidence proving the person was their property. If court officials were satisfied by their proof—which often took the form of a signed affidavit—the owner would be permitted to take custody of the slave and return to their home state. The law also imposed a $500 penalty on any person who helped harbor or conceal escaped slaves.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was immediately met with a firestorm of criticism. Northerners bristled at the idea of turning their states into a stalking ground for bounty hunters, and many argued the law was tantamount to legalized kidnapping. Some abolitionists organized clandestine resistance groups and built complex networks of safe houses to aid slaves in their escape to the North.

Explanation:

basically: Following increased pressure from Southern politicians, Congress passed a revised Fugitive Slave Act in 1850. Part of Henry Clay's famed Compromise of 1850—a group of bills that helped quiet early calls for Southern secession—this new law forcibly compelled citizens to assist in the capture of runaway slaves.

You might be interested in
Who are the decision makers for the private sector in the U.S economy?
Travka [436]

Answer:

The Government

Explanation:

I hope this help❤️

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A or B? What was Ellis Island? a place where immigrants were processed, most being sent back to their home countries a place whe
Artyom0805 [142]
Ellis Island was "a place where immigrants were <span>processed and evaluated for entry to the United States". Although some were sent back home, a majority of them were let in. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1832 hey Supreme Court, Georgia did not have legal authority over the Cherokees living in the states. President Andrew Jackso
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:

President Andrew Johnson declined to enact the verdict by the supreme court.

Explanation:

The President, Andrew Johnson responded to the decision by the supreme court by declining to enact their decisions. He rather enforced further laws that were against the Cherokees and they were gradually forced out of the land.

7 0
3 years ago
What's the new deal how can you criticize it
Ber [7]
The new deal was a program for the great depression made by us senates and franklin d Roosevelt to help with the us economic problems
5 0
3 years ago
Egypt is home to one of the oldest human civilizations. The
Luden [163]

Answer: Some modern observers worry powerful military leaders have seized too much power in the country.

Explanation: An event from the passage that addresses an event in the past is that some observers noted some powerful military leaders have seized too much power in the country, despite having its own constitution and elected leaders. This writer narrate what some observers worry about the too much power that some powerful Egypt military leaders possess presently, the writer claims it is possible to lead Egypt to become an autocratic state.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • If the law forbids the sale of something above a certain price that price is called
    8·1 answer
  • Which right is protected by the Florida constitution but unprotected by the United State Constitution?
    10·2 answers
  • What did the Zagwe Dynasty and Kongo have in common? They both warred with the Portuguese. They both were situated along the Nil
    7·2 answers
  • What factors contributed to the establishment of<br> organized communities?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of postponing the date of the consultation?
    7·1 answer
  • For 24 points, why is Portuguese spoken in Brazil?
    11·2 answers
  • Can someone write a speech proving the civil war was inevitable
    11·1 answer
  • The Constitutional Amendment that was violated in this case was the 14th Amendment of Equal Protection.
    12·1 answer
  • why did the u.s department of justice arrest and deport hundreds of suspected anarchists and socialists in 1919-1920?
    15·1 answer
  • I was soon put down under the decks, and there I received such a salutation [greeting] in my nostrils as I had never experienced
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!