Answer:
Paying attention to what the negative is saying.
Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.
If I have any thinking about a possible counterclaim
Explanation:
What should you be doing while the negative is presenting a claim and evidence?
Paying attention to what the negative is saying.
Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.
If I have any thinking about a possible counterclaim
During the course of negative presenting a claim and evidence, it is important to pay attention to what the negative is saying, which will be very handy when preparing the counterclaim to argue against the negative claims.Secondly, during the course of this presentation, one's must identify important pieces of evidence that the negative uses which provide rebuttal evidence to counter it when presenting and lastly,you must be t
hinking about a possible counterclaim in order to rebuttal all the negative claims and evidence.
Answer:
Superposition
Explanation:
The Law of superposition dictates that, in undisturbed stratigraphy, those items found deeper in the ground will be older than those found closer to the surface.
The law of superposition states that under normal circumstances, deeper layer of rocks or soil particles are older than those above them.
Answer:
Academic learning time.
Explanation:
The Academin learning time, refered to as ALT, is the amount of time in which students are active, successfull, and productively enganed in learning.
In this case, Alice is boosting the ALT of her students by structuring her instructions and giving them the choice of working alone or with her. Those students who struggle can be helped by her and those who don't can work on their own or however they feel most comfortable.
Answer:
Yes, Quebec should be a country.
Canada is a federation, meaning that its citizens have to pay taxes for both the federal (canadian) government and the provincial (quebec) government. This split makes it harder for the people of Quebec to strategically invest in its own industries. For example, Quebec has long ago nationalized hydroelectricity making the state a leader in green energy. When Quebecers decided to do so, the canadian government refused to invest even a single dollar in the project. Quebec’s prime minister at that time had to go see the americans to ask for a sufficient loan. What a shame it was to the canadian government going against such a nice project! Fast forward to now, Nova Scotia government (another province located next to Quebec being part of the canadian confederation) has the project to built all the infrastructure to export hydroelectricity to the US… and guess what? Canadian Government is totally in favor of the idea and willing to fund the project with fresh capital, part of that capital coming from taxes paid by Quebecers. So Quebec taxes will help fund a competitor since Quebec is already exporting a lot of energy to their US partners while it had absolutely no help when they built their own hydroelectricity project.
This example is just one of the many examples that Quebecers have had to endure over the past decades. When the financial crisis happened in 08-09, Ontario’s auto industry have been bailed out for more than $10 Billion from the Canadian Government (again, part of this money - roughly 20% - came from Quebec’s taxes paid to the federal government). At that same time, Quebec was struggling with its paper/pulp industry and the federal government injected less than 100M$ in the industry to help it. Now Bombardier, one of the great engeneering business of Quebec is struggling, and guess what? Quebec has to inject all of the money to help them since canadian government won't do a single thing.
A lot of the people in Quebec stand against the building of pipelines that would allow dirty oil sands to cross the eastern part of the country for international exportation. Canadians want Quebec to accept the pipeline since it would help the western part of the country to export/sell its dirty oil internationally. As a province, Quebec doesn’t have any legal capacity to oppose to such project while this goes a lot against their willingness. If Quebec was a country, it could oppose to such thing and participate to a greater extend to a cleaner planet. Quebecers have all the capacity and knowledge to invest massively in clean energy and stop using oil for transport over a short timeframe. The only things that is keeping them away is the fact that it does not have control over all its revenues while the federal government have a totally different gameplan.
Being a country would allow Quebecers to gain 100% control over their taxes and would leave them with more money to do good things for the whole planet. We would be leaders in clean energy instead of subsidizing the dirty oilsands in the western part of the country. Our army would be one of peace keeping and territory protection and our peace keeping message would be heard amongst UN and UNESCO. We would be a much better leader amongst nations willing the reduce greenhouse gas instead of financing oil sands. Our engineering firms like Hydro-Quebec would be venturing project like electrification of transport.
Not only Quebec should be a country but people all around the world should support them in their quest for the building of a great new country.
Southern Secession
Northerners believed that the national government's power was supreme over that of the states. Southerners felt that the abolition of slavery would destroy their region's economy. Northerners believed that slavery should be abolished for moral reasons.
