1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveticcg [70]
3 years ago
9

After the fall of the Berlin Wall, which nation broke up into many independent states? Hungary Romania Poland Yugoslavia

History
2 answers:
Marianna [84]3 years ago
8 0
After the fall of the Berlin Wall the nation which broke up into many independent states was Yugoslavia. Before the fall of the Berlin Wall, Yugoslavia was just one country in southeastern Europe, but after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the country was divided into different socialist republics being: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Slovenia and Serbia.
iragen [17]3 years ago
5 0
Yugoslavia broke up into many countries: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, and Macedonia (whose official name is the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.)
You might be interested in
Please help !!
deff fn [24]
Out of all the answers, C is the most likely. Majority of our current forms of energy are nonrenewable resources. As such, we're using them all up.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which statement was part of an initial draft of the Declaration of Independence, but not part of the final version of the Declar
DanielleElmas [232]
No answer choices for me to pick from
3 0
3 years ago
QUESTION 66
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
B. South Texas
due to the fact of the coastal area and the border which creates a economic Core Area
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where is the Okefenokee swamp
nata0808 [166]

The  Okefenokee Swamp is in Georgia


5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did the space needles construction start
    7·1 answer
  • Between 10,000 and 2,500 years ago, many regional ________ developed among the peoples of the americas.
    10·1 answer
  • Which is a correct statement about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?. A) It was adopted by the UN Security Council duri
    10·2 answers
  • What region became a crossroads where farmers, traders, and invaders settled, traded, and exchanged ideas
    7·1 answer
  • What was the controversy surrounding the creation of the transportation addministation
    15·1 answer
  • For how long did the slave importation clause prohibit a ban on importing<br> enslaved people?
    12·1 answer
  • Define Cash Crops in 5 words or less​
    12·2 answers
  • On a two-dimensional graph representing two variables:
    15·1 answer
  • What is the Columbian Exchange and how was it beneficial? in your own words
    6·1 answer
  • Who had the power in song dynasty society?​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!