1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
3 years ago
10

A school district in California held its graduation at a local church which statement best explains whether this action violated

the establishment cause and why
History
2 answers:
SVETLANKA909090 [29]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

If a school district in California held its graduation at a local church, this action violated the establishment cause because it carried on government issues within a religious context.

Explanation:

The Establishment Clause is the first of several pronouncements in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, stating that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion".

The Establishment Clause prohibits 1) the establishment of an official religion by Congress, or 2) the preference of the US government for one religion over another. The first approach is called the "separation" or the interpretation of the "non-help", while the second interpretation is called the "non-preferential" or "accommodation" interpretation. The non-preferential interpretation prohibits the Congress from preferring one religion over another, but it does not prohibit the entry of the government into religious domains to accommodate aspects that serve to achieve the purposes of the Free Practice Clause.

Natasha_Volkova [10]3 years ago
6 0

The answer is A on edge. It violated the establishment clause because it held a school function at a denominational church, which demonstrates support for a specific religion.

You might be interested in
What happened to major leaders who were on the loosing end of Victoray in Europe day
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

Soviet leader Josef Stalin

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
To what is FDR referring to when he says that the democracies, by fighting aggression, “are keeping war away from our hemisphere
Roman55 [17]

This quote comes from the now famous Four Freedoms speech, delivered by Roosevelt as the State of the Union address on January 6, 1941. The international context was very negative. Hitler and his Axis allies were winning in Europe. Britain was greatly menaced and the Japanese were gearing up for all-out war in the Pacific and in Asia.

Roosevelt, aware that scientific progress had eliminated the physical advantage of the USA being separated from Europe and Asia by such vast expanses of water had been arming and funding the British for years and had also increased military spending and the Navy in order to keep Japan at bay.

He knew that once Hitler had conquered Europe and Japan had conquered the East, all the populations and resources of these vast reasons would be used to directly attack the USA, which would eventually find itself in numeric inferiority so in order to prevent such a dark future he chose to send weapons, supplies and money to the British.


7 0
3 years ago
What kind of patterns do historians look as they track differences in societies?
AlekseyPX

The correct answer is sequences of comparable events.

<em>The kind of patterns that historians look as they track differences in societies are sequences of comparable events. </em>

When doing research on differences in societies, historians have to look for patterns in the societies they are studying to try to find sequences of comparable events. They need to compare similar variables in the societies they are comparing in order to have an accurate and valid comparison on circumstances, dates, and events.  

The other options of the question were, b) sequences of events that have nothing to do with each other, c) sequence of colors, and d) the order in which events occurred.

8 0
3 years ago
John Tyler became the President in 1841 and, within one year, his entire cabinet resigned and he was expelled from the Whig part
Sedaia [141]
True. he was expelled from the whig party.
6 0
3 years ago
In 1967, the united states supreme court ruled unanimously that laws prohibiting interracial marriage were unconstitutional, whi
larisa86 [58]
The correct answer is <span>anti-miscegenation. Anti-miscegenation means being against interracial marriage or interracial relationship. This was legal in the old times and until 1967 it was illegal in some places for African-Americans to be in a relationship with Caucasian people. It changed thanks to the supreme court.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What major trade route between and china was nicknamed for the type of good it moved
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes Renaissance art?
    10·2 answers
  • Compared With Travel On Wagons, Travel On The Transcontinental Railroad Was ___?
    8·2 answers
  • In order to break the soviet blockade against west berlin in 1948
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me How did urbanization, new technology, westward expansion, and
    11·1 answer
  • Based on the map, which of these places is not part of Venice's commercial trade route?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the most conducive topography to sustain life in africa and why?
    8·1 answer
  • List the following events in correct chronological order​
    13·1 answer
  • Which scenario could be represented by the algebraic expression StartFraction 365 Over y EndFraction?
    12·2 answers
  • Which group would most likely support a bill of rights? Liberals, nationalists or conservatives?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!