Answer:The figurative language makes it much easier to focus on what is about to happen and the author doesn't use any connotations.The figurative language in this passage creates a scene where if you focus and read the passage very carefully and slow then you actually start to experience the feeling of it all coming to life.
The correct citation is Seashell, Shelly. The Great Ape Goes Bananas. Beacon Press, 2008, pp. 627.
<h3>What are the elements of a citation?</h3>
The elements that you should include vary depending on the type of publication, as well as the citation manual or style you follow. However, the basic elements for citing a book in MLA format are:
- Name of the author (last name first)
- Title of Book.
- The City of Publication (only included if the publisher is unknown).
- Publisher.
- Publication Date.
Based on this, the correct citation would be;
- Seashell, Shelly. The Great Ape Goes Bananas. Beacon Press, 2008.
Moreover, the page should be added if there is a direct quotation or if you are paraphrasing very specific details. In this case, the citation would be:
- Seashell, Shelly. The Great Ape Goes Bananas. Beacon Press, 2008, pp. 627.
Learn more about citation in: brainly.com/question/1272936
B is you answer!
<span>B. Prepare, plan, write, edit</span>
Answer:
Firstly, the main idea of a paragraph is generally its first sentence (the topic sentence). If not, first identify the topic of the paragraph. Next, look for what claim the supporting details are pointing towards.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
- Congress had changed the meaning of the First Amendment, rather than enforcing it.
- Congress had created a law that was not proportional to the problem it was fixing.
- Congress had taken away states’ rights by passing the RFRA.
Explanation:
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 was passed in light of the Supreme Court upholding an Oregon state decision to deny two American Indian men unemployment benefits for having taken a banned substance which they normally use in their religious events.
Congress passed this bill with only 3 Senators opposing it so that it could prevent such from happening again.
The Supreme Court however ruled the Act as unconstitutional as it claimed that Congress was overexerting its powers by: changing the meaning of the First Amendment, creating a law that was disproportionate to the problems it was fixing and overexerting federal power on states and taking away their rights to manage their affairs in this regard.
