Jomo Kenyatta is an example of an independence leader during the 20th century.
Kenyatta started as an anti-colonial activist in Kenya, working to get the British to leave. After the end of the colonial era, Kenyatta served as Prime Minister and then President. His rule was not without controversy but he is largely regarded as the Father of modern-day Kenya.
Answer: It doubled the size of the country and guaranteed US control of the Mississippi River.
Explanation: President Thomas Jefferson and those favoring the Louisiana Purchase justified it as an act done for the good of the country. Initially, President Jefferson had commissioned James Monroe and Robert Livingston to negotiate a deal with France to acquire New Orleans or all or part of Florida, as a means of avoiding the potential of an armed conflict in such areas. Monroe and Livingston were authorized to spend up to $10 million. What they found out was that Napoleon was already set to sell a much wider range of territory to the United States, to finance his European wars. Napoleon was asking $22 million for the whole territory that became the Louisiana Purchase. The US team negotiated the price down to $15 million. But then there was a constitutional crisis back home. Did the President have the authority under the constitution to make such a major addition to the nation's territory and spend the nation's funds to do so? Jefferson himself considered pursuing a constitutional amendment, but his Cabinet members disagreed and the measure was sent to Congress for approval. In a statement he made at the time, Jefferson justified the purchase with this analogy: "“It is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; and saying to him when of age, I did this for your good."
I believe the answer would be a
We can actually deduce here there that Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 recognized the legitimacy of local reservation law and guaranteed reservation residents the protections of the Bill of Rights.
<h3>What is The Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968?</h3>
The Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 is actually known to be the law that actually recognises the Native American groups as citizens. It is a federal law. The Act actually granted Native American people the full access to the United States Bill of Rights.
We see here that Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 actually guaranteed reservation residents the protections of the Bill of Rights.
Learn more about The Indian Civil Rights Act on brainly.com/question/7627008
#SPJ12
<span>After the outbreak of the Revolutionary War, the thirteen American colonies needed a government to replace the British system they were attempting to overthrow. The Founding Fathers’ first attempt at such governance was formed around the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were first proposed at the Second Continental Congress in 1777 in Philadelphia. They were fully ratified and put into effect in 1781. The reign of the Articles of Confederation was brief. Why did the articles of confederation fail? What were the flaws of the Articles of Confederation and how did it distribute power? Read more to discover why by 1789 the former colonies were under the law of a new governing document—the Constitution of the United States of America.
Hope this helps.</span>