Answer:
D
Explanation:
aimless means without purpose
Example: I was pacing around the room aimlessly trying to figure out what to do.
Answer:
Misunderstanding/miscommunication
Explanation:
Well if you both speak different languages, it would be hard to communicate, leading to misunderstandings or just not understanding at all.
The sentence from the passage that best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate is: The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didn't have as much supporting evidence.
A parliamentary debate is held in academic settings and it originated from the British Parliament. In a parliamentary debate their are two sides who have their own points and support them with evidence.
In the chosen option, we see that the Taft team had a counterclaim. Even though they were making an argument, they did not have a supporting evidence.
This shows that they were engaging in a parliamentary debate that they were not properly prepared for.
Learn more about parliamentary debates here:
brainly.com/question/1695492
