Answer: alternative A.
Explanation: The Intolerable Acts resulted in the closing of the port of Boston and Massachusset's governor obtaining more political powers. These consequences ended in riots among the population.
Answer:
Charlemagne instituted principles for accounting practice by means of the Capitulare de Villas of 802, which laid down strict rules for the way in which incomes and expenses were to be recorded. Early in Charlemagne's rule he tacitly allowed the Jews to monopolize money lending.
Britain, who was at the war with France again, would seize American ships and force Americans sailors to join the British Navy (impressment). The U.S. declared war on Britain in 1812 because Britain refused to stop seizing American ships that traded with France.
Answer:
No, because the king was taking all the money for himself. He should be distributing money to all his loyal subjects who worked had for the money they must give to him.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Relatively few people, in or out of the field of science, believe in Bigfoot. A purported Bigfoot sighting would likely be met with the same level of credulity as a discovery of Casper, Elvis, Tupac, or Santa Claus. With only 16 percent of Americans Bigfoot believers, you might just write them off as crazy. But contrary to popular assumption, folklore experts say, Bigfoot believers may not be as irrational as you’d think.
“It’s easy to assume … that people who believe in Bigfoot are being irrational in their belief,” says Lynne McNeill, Cal grad, folklore professor, and special guest on the reality TV show Finding Bigfoot. “But that’s really not true. People aren’t jumping to supernatural conclusions very often; people are being quite rational. It doesn’t mean they’re correct; it just means they’re thinking rationally.”
OK. So what are some reasons why people might rationalize a belief in Bigfoot?
