Answer:
(-3,10) (0,5) (3,0) (6,-5)
Step-by-step explanation:
x intercept = 3
y intercept =5
If brainiest is earned its greatly appreciated
Answer:
a) The arithmetic sequence with common difference 2 that has 8 as the first term.
b) The arithmetic sequence of common difference -5 and first term 15.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's use for example the arithmetic sequence with common difference 2 that has 8 as the first term. Then the first two terms of this sequence are:
8, and (8+2) = 10 Therefore the second term is 10.
Another arithmetic sequence of common difference -5 and first term 15. The firs two terms of this sequence are:
15, and (15 - 5) = 10. Therefore again a 10 as second term.
For a height of 4.3m and bases of 9.2 m and 3.2m, the area of the trapezoid is mathematically given as
A=26.7
<h3>What is the area of the trapezoid?</h3>
Generally, the equation for the trapezoid is mathematically given as
A=0.5*(a+b)*h
Therefore
A=0.5*(3.2+9.2)*4.3
A=26.7
In conclusion,area of the trapezoid
A=26.7
Read more about Arithmetic
brainly.com/question/22568180
So, the dog eats 5 cups a day and 1 pound of dog food is 10.5 cups.
A 50 lb bag is<span> $22.50.
Since you're asking how much it would cost to feed it a day we need to find out how much 1 pound of food costs.
</span>22.50 / 50 = 0.45
So, it's 0.45 for 1 lb. But 1 lb is 10.5 cups, not 5.
0.45 / 5 = 0.09
So, I believe it would cost 0.09 each day to feed the dog.
Answer:
No, because the 95% confidence interval contains the hypothesized value of zero.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
You have the information regarding two calcium supplements.
X₁: Calcium content of supplement 1
n₁= 12
X[bar]₁= 1000mg
S₁= 23 mg
X₂: Calcium content of supplement 2
n₂= 15
X[bar]₂= 1016mg
S₂= 24mg
It is known that X₁~N(μ₁; σ²₁), X₂~N(μ₂;δ²₂) and σ²₁=δ²₂=?
The claim is that both supplements have the same average calcium content:
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂ = 0
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂ ≠ 0
α: 0.05
The confidence level and significance level are to be complementary, so if 1 - α: 0.95 then α:0.05
since these are two independent samples from normal populations and the population variances are equal, you have to use a pooled variance t-test to construct the interval:
[(X[bar]₁-X[bar]₂) ±
*
]


[(1000-1016)±2.060*23.57*
]
[-34.80;2.80] mg
The 95% CI contains the value under the null hypothesis: "zero", so the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis. Then using a 5% significance level you can conclude that there is no difference between the average calcium content of supplements 1 and 2.
I hope it helps!