1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
murzikaleks [220]
3 years ago
8

should people who are a burden be euthanized to spare both themselves, and others because they are a waste of time and tax dolla

rs?
History
2 answers:
KonstantinChe [14]3 years ago
7 0
No, putting people to death isn't good.
It really depends on what you call a waste. However, it is up to the government to euthanize someone. As well as it really depends on what you refer to as a waste. As well as in most places euthanasia is limited to veterinarians when it comes to animals. So if they are a living being and were to euthanize themselves it would be considered suicide. Suicide isn't the answer to anything. 
WITCHER [35]3 years ago
6 0
Ro, don't play with life...
If they're still alive, don't do it cuz it's considered murder....
(You're killing someone living...are you not?)

You might be interested in
Why was there a need for order after the death of Charlemagne in 1814
Mademuasel [1]
<span>The rulers who followed him could not defend the empire against new waves of invasions.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following groups worked to reduce the alcohol consumption
Troyanec [42]
The American Anti-Slavery Society the National Women's Suffrage Association the American Temperance Society the American Philosophical Society.
5 0
2 years ago
Who did germany, italy, and japan invade in the 1930s?
kiruha [24]
In 1930, they invaded America.
8 0
2 years ago
briefy explain one way urban redesign programs such as the one in Vienna altered European social life.
natita [175]

<span> “</span>And thereupon the said lords spiritual and temporal and commons . . . do . . . declare that the pretended power of suspending of laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of parliament is illegal.

 

That levying money for or to the use of the crown . . . without grant of parliament for longer time or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted is illegal.

 

That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king and all commitments and protections for such petitioning are illegal.

 

That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace unless it be with consent of parliament is against law. . . .

 

That election of members of parliament ought to be free. . . .”




5 0
3 years ago
Which two groups competed as a result of the split among European Christians during the 1500s?
kherson [118]
D. Protestants and Catholics
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was not one of the consequences of the collapse of Mycenaean civilization?
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the United States attack Afghanistan following the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001?
    12·2 answers
  • What three countries were formed out of what was once called indochina?
    14·2 answers
  • The Berlin Airlift was a Cold War victory for:
    13·1 answer
  • What was the U.S. President's immediate response to the 9/11 attack
    8·1 answer
  • Many homes today are equipped with “smart” devices, sometimes called “always on” devices. One such type of device will take orde
    8·1 answer
  • 1. The War with Spain in 1898 was not the first effort by the United States to reach beyond its land-holdings in North America.
    15·1 answer
  • When was the mappa mundi created
    11·1 answer
  • Prior to Muhammad, most Arabs practiced <br> . (polytheism/Sufism
    7·2 answers
  • Chapter 11, Section 2 - Terms and Names
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!