Throughout most of its history, texas has been a state, first controlled by the democratic party and now controlled by the repub
lican party. when the democratic party dominated texas politics, republicans often participated in the democratic primary, voted for conservative democrats at the state level and for for president. as republicans gained power in the state, the texas democratic party become more and less influential politically. in addition, differences have emerged within the republican party as to what type of issues should be prioritized.
Throughout most of its history, texas has been a state, first controlled by the democratic party and now controlled by the republican party. when the democratic party dominated texas politics, republicans often participated in the democratic primary, voted for conservative democrats at the state level and for for president. as republicans gained power in the state, the texas democratic party become more and less influential politically. in addition, differences have emerged within the republican party as to what type of issues should be prioritized.
Explanation:
Throughout most of its history, texas has been a state, first controlled by the democratic party and now controlled by the republican party. when the democratic party dominated texas politics, republicans often participated in the democratic primary, voted for conservative democrats at the state level and for for president. as republicans gained power in the state, the texas democratic party become more and less influential politically. in addition, differences have emerged within the republican party as to what type of issues should be prioritized.
Because a monopoly would end up making someone monopolizing the whole world to a point where no one can buy a business and would allow them to set their prices as high as they want.
Because history gives us the tools to analyze and explain problems in the past, it positions us to see patterns that might otherwise be invisible in the present – thus providing a crucial perspective for understanding (and solving!) current and future problems.
Even though President Reagan was absolved of any guilt in the Iran-Contra Affair, he was harshly criticized for "<span>not knowing what was going on with his National Security subordinates" since he was often unaware that they were making moves to remedy the situation.</span>