Answer: French 18th-century and 19th-century constitutions as well US constitution (18th century) are believed that constitute the basis and fundament of today´s modern democracies but in their original version they were made for white man. So one can say that "we Americans" is a hypocritical statement because excluded many people. The same can be said about the French constitution (1st French republic) that contradicts its preamble (the test speaks of "les droits universells de l´homme et du citoyen").
Explanation: what was said above perfectly demonstrates that 18th-century intellectual revolution was a revolution of white European man from which many were excluded (indians, women, poor).
To review decisions and change outcomes of decisions of lower courts.
The website is the secondary, good and can be biased source of information.
Are websites reliable sources of knowledge?
Although government websites are reliable, watch out for sites that are trying to trick you by using these suffixes. Websites run by nonprofit organizations may also include trustworthy information, but you should take some time to analyze these factors to see if they might be biased.
Do websites serve as the primary source of information?
If a website synthesizes, analyses, and processes data from primary sources, it qualifies as a secondary source. A secondary source website may contain published blog entries, review articles, bibliographies, reference volumes, indexes, journals, commentaries, and treatises as well as other types of information.
Learn more about the website as a source of information with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11170060
#SPJ4
They were slave states that could've joined the Confederacy.
