My personal opinion on the given quote is that the speaker is right because there are a lot of social media users that send hate to others, without punishment.
<h3>What is a Quote?</h3>
This refers to the words of a person that is enclosed in inverted commas to show their words, verbatim.
Hence, we can see that based on the given quote about the issue of social media regulation that was made by Elon Musk in 2018, I agree with him that social media should be regulated.
Read more about social media regulation here:
brainly.com/question/3653791
#SPJ1
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
I believe that they should recive up to 5 years in prision or 5,000 dollar fine.
Answer:
Explanation:
This is the famous case of Hamer vs Sidway in which the court decided forbearance is in facr legal consideration and held the contract valid. Here is a summary:
The Court of Appeals reversed and directed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate. Judge Alton Parker (later Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals), writing for a unanimous court, wrote that the forbearance of legal rights by Story II, namely the consensual abstinence from "drinking liquor, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until he should become 21 years of age" constituted consideration in exchange for the promise given by Story I. Because the forbearance was valid consideration given by a party (Story II) in exchange for a promise to perform by another party (Story I), the promise was contractually obligated to fulfill the promise.
Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.
