Answer:
here
Explanation:
Foreshadowing Apartheid Identities were recast by outsiders, as South Africa's native peoples were pressed into legal categories originally created to identify and control slaves. ... This system was extended to all black South African men and women in the Transvaal and Orange Free State by the mid-nineteenth century.
Answer:
They viewed it as a better choice due to its opposition to a central federal system which didn't have respect for the sovereignty of Indian nations.
Answer: It will hurt your credit.
Explanation: Paying that bill will help you build credit and you can add it on your credit report.
First, they argued that the white Americans (and their black slaves) needed the land and could make better use of it. They argued that Americans could make the land more economically productive than the Indians had been able to. Second, the proponents argued from the idea of white superiority. They argued that the Indians were inferior and that it was not necessary to treat them fairly.
The best option from the list would be "<span>The guillotine was an effective instrument for instilling fear and conflict," since this is an opinion that needs to be supported with historical evidence. The other options are simply facts (or non-facts). </span>
