1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WARRIOR [948]
3 years ago
15

How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?

History
1 answer:
vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago
6 0

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as <span>dux </span>(leader) and also, later <span>princeps </span>(first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero<span>.</span>

You might be interested in
Discuss Machiavelli's beliefs about the state.
erastova [34]

Answer:

Machiavelli's “state” remains a personal patrimony, a possession more in line with the medieval conception of dominium as the foundation of rule.

Explanation:

In order to “maintain his state”, then, he can only rely upon his own fount of personal characteristics to direct the use of power and establish his claim on rulership. hope this helps you :)

8 0
3 years ago
Need a WW1 meme for history class, anyone have an idea?
Gnesinka [82]

Answer:

herr u go me frieng XDXD

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
True or False:
Oliga [24]

Answer:

False

the Senate has to vote that person out based on the nature of the crime

5 0
2 years ago
What two reforms followed the revival of Temple worship in Judah under Hezekiah?
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Your answers should be "Idols were broken" and "Altars of false worshiop were destroyed."

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Purpose of the length of the term for a US Supreme Court Justice is to
Ratling [72]

Answer: prevent decisions based on the pressures of maintaining elected office

Explanation: The Supreme court is the judicial branch of the federal government and the highest court in the country. It has jurisdiction over all federal & state courts. The

main purpose of the Supreme court is to interpret the law and defend the Constitution. Often they must hear the cases of lower federal courts and ensure that laws follow the Constitution.

Supreme Court justices have life tenure, which means that they serve until they die, resign or retire, unless they are impeached and removed from office by the Senate for wrongful behaviour. The purpose of this life tenure is to make certain the highest court of the country decide cases based on merit, and not have to worry about the pressure associated with elected office.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do you think people in the Western Hemisphere reacted to America’s statement in the Monroe Doctrine?
    13·1 answer
  • After the Civil War, most former slaves moved away from the South. true or false
    15·1 answer
  • Vice President Dic.k Cheney was called upon to temporarily assume the office of president when __________.
    13·2 answers
  • Which best explains why the Ku Klux Klan was formed?
    11·1 answer
  • Was the bay of pigs invasion successful in american standards?why or why not?
    8·1 answer
  • Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
    15·2 answers
  • School band members need to raise money for new uniforms. Some members want to sell energy drinks at a
    7·2 answers
  • Writing an Analysis of a Literary<br> Character!<br> please i will give you 45 points
    13·1 answer
  • Smile though your heart is aching
    15·2 answers
  • The philosophy that viewed government as unnatural and the cause of most problems is
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!