1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WARRIOR [948]
3 years ago
15

How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?

History
1 answer:
vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago
6 0

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as <span>dux </span>(leader) and also, later <span>princeps </span>(first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero<span>.</span>

You might be interested in
Why did the Zulu of Africa attack Dutch colonists?
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

Zulus, a migrant people from the north, also came to southern Africa during the 17th century, settling around the Tugela River region. In December 1878, Cetshwayo rejected the British demand that he disband his troops, and in January British forces invaded Zululand to suppress Cetshwayo.

Explanation: hope it helps ^w^

4 0
3 years ago
World War 2 | WWII | Im going to be 100% honest i have no clue what to put in the blanks please help if possible
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

first box - stronger leader

2nd box - weak leader

8 0
2 years ago
Why did Nixon feel this was the case he had been waiting for
blondinia [14]

Because it could drastically change his career.

6 0
3 years ago
What were the two revolutions that happened in Russia before 1916?
ivolga24 [154]

Answer:

Explanation:

Bloody Sunday in 1905 and the Russian defeat in the Russo-Japanese War both helped lead to the 1917 revolution. After taking over, the Bolsheviks promised 'peace, land, and bread' to the Russian people. ... The tsar and other Romanovs were executed by the Bolsheviks after the revolution.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following caused civil unrest in the 1960's? A. Rural America was poor while most people in cities were rich. B. Wo
qaws [65]
Out of the choices given, the one that caused the most civil unrest in the 1960's was black citizens were still fighting against discrimination. This makes the correct answer E. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why does the legislative branch makes the laws in the United States
    12·1 answer
  • Who renamed the Byzantine capital Istanbul
    6·2 answers
  • One of the significant changes in atmosphere in jefferson's administration was: a- the number of common people involved in gover
    7·2 answers
  • How was the econmy affected by the actions Andrew Jackson took toward the National Bank?​
    8·1 answer
  • I will mark brainliest to whoever helps. ThankU ^-^
    12·2 answers
  • what are your opinions about roe. when does the right of individual privacy come into conflict with the law
    5·1 answer
  • What was Max Factor’s contribution to the makeup industry?
    7·1 answer
  • The fist time a student does a research at the local library where is the best place to start
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone please help meeeeee i need it quick
    7·1 answer
  • Which describes Abigail Adams?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!