1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WARRIOR [948]
3 years ago
15

How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?

History
1 answer:
vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago
6 0

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as <span>dux </span>(leader) and also, later <span>princeps </span>(first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero<span>.</span>

You might be interested in
What was Nicholas Copernicus known for?
uysha [10]
C. Using a specific model to prove the earth moving around the Sun.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Grand Canal was built to connect the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. the Yangtze River and the East China Sea. the Huang
NeX [460]

Answer: The Huang He River and the Yangtze River.

The Grand Canal is the longest and oldest canal or artificial river in the world. The oldest parts of the canal date back to the 5th century BC, but it was significantly rebuilt between 1271 and 1633. The canal starts at Beijing, passes through Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong, Jiangsu and Zhejiang to the city of Hangzhou. The canal links the Huang He and the Yangtze rivers.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did England treat the colonies prior to the Revolution?
lozanna [386]
England treated the colonists unjustly, which is why they revolted against the crown and created their own nation. So the answer would be D. I hope this helps :)
6 0
2 years ago
Which law made it harder for some Europeans to immigrate to the United States and easier for others? (people are saying differen
tatiyna
I think that maybe people are saying different answers because there might have been many such laws. I will mention one example: the  Diversity Visa Immigration: it means that people from Eastern Europe have a higher change of obtaining a visa due to a smaller population in the US than the western European Countries.
3 0
3 years ago
What difficulties did immigrants face on their journey to the united states?
NeTakaya
I Thought Maybe Is Drowning
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the goals of the Knights of Labor differ from those of the AFL?
    5·2 answers
  • Make a timeline of at least four major events or turning points in the American Revolution.
    5·1 answer
  • Who was Ulysses S. Grant? A. Andrew Jackson's Vice President B. The President of the Confederate States C. A Union General D. A
    11·2 answers
  • How did the battle of the marne expand the war beyond a regional struggle?
    11·1 answer
  • One reason the Byzantine Empire outlived the Western Roman Empire was that __________.
    12·1 answer
  • Actions by which body resulted in the fall of the Roman republic and the rise of the Roman Empire? A) centuriate assembly B) ass
    5·1 answer
  • Which area on the map was purchased from France in 1803? A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) 4
    8·2 answers
  • Which 19th century reformer and reform movement are correctly matched?
    12·2 answers
  • Do you know this it is for social studies
    6·2 answers
  • How can the Federal Reserve use open market operations to influence the national economy?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!