1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WARRIOR [948]
3 years ago
15

How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?

History
1 answer:
vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago
6 0

First it's important to think about the complications involved with the word “empire.” Rome was an empire (country ruling over other countries) before the first emperor, but the word derives from imperator, the name used by Augustus. But it meant “wielder of military power,” a kind of uber-general and was specifically not supposed to connote the idea of an emperor as we think of it today (the goal was to avoid being called a king or being seen as one). Earlier, Augustus was known as <span>dux </span>(leader) and also, later <span>princeps </span>(first citizen). As far as I know, in the days of the republic, Rome called the provinces just provinciaeor socii or amici, without a general term for their empire unless it was imperium romanum, but that really meant the military power of Rome (over others) without being a reference to the empire as a political entity. It didn’t become an empire because of the emperors, and the way we use these words now can cloud the already complicated political situation in Rome in the 1st century BC.

The point is this: the Roman Republic did have an empire as we conceive it, but the Senate was unwilling to make changes that would have enabled it to retain power over the empire. By leaving it to proconsuls to rule provinces, they allowed proconsuls, who were often generals of their armies whether they were actually proconsul at any given time or not, to accrue massive military power (imperium) that could be exerted over Rome itself. (This, by the way, is in part the inspiration behind moving American soldiers around so much—it takes away the long-term loyalty a soldier may have toward a particular general.)

So the Senate found itself in no position to defy Caesar, who named himself the constitutional title of dictator for increasing periods until he was dictator for life, or Octavian (later named Augustus), who eventually named himself imperator.

The Senate had plenty of warning about this. The civil wars between Sulla and Marius gave plenty of reason for it to make real changes, but they were so wedded to the mos maiorum (tradition of the ancestors) that they were not willing to address the very real dangers to the republic that their constitution, which was designed for a city-state, was facing (not that I have too many bright ideas about what they could have done).

To finally come around to the point, the Senate went from being the leading body of Rome to being a rubber stamp on whatever the imperator wished, but there was no single moment when Rome became an empire and the Senate lost power, and these transformations don't coincide.

For one thing, the second triumvirate was legally sanctioned (unlike the informal first triumvirate), so it was a temporary measure—it lasted two 5-year terms— and the time Octavian spent as dux was ambiguous as to where he actually stood or would stand over the long term (in 33 BC, the second term of the second triumvirate expired, and he was not made imperator until 27). When he named himself imperator, he solidified that relationship and took on the posts of consul and tribune (and various combinations of posts as time went on).

If we simplify, we would say that the Senate was the leading body of Rome before the first emperor and a prestigious but powerless body afterwards, though senators were influential in their own milieus.

One other thing to keep in mind is that Octavian’s rise to Caesar Imperator Augustus Was by no means peaceful and amicable. He gets a reputation in many people’s minds as dictatorial but stable and peaceful, but the proscriptions of the second triumvirate were every bit as bloody and greedy as those of Sulla. Ironically, it was Julius Caesar who was forgiving to his former enemies after he named himself dictator. Augustus did end widespread killings and confiscations after becoming imperator, but that was only after striking fear into everyone and wiping out all his enemies, including the likes of Cicero<span>.</span>

You might be interested in
Influenced by the chaotic time in which he lived, this school wanted to bring good government and stability to the people. He be
goldenfox [79]

Answer B

Confucius

Confucius was a Chinese Philosopher, teacher and political figure who lived 500 BC. His ideas were of ethical models of family and public interaction as well as setting educational standards.

7 0
3 years ago
What are some of the ways that people benefit from an economy that moves away from a command economy and more toward a socialist
Phoenix [80]

The benefits for the people by moving from command towards socialist, or even better towards a market economy, are that they will get bigger power and also larger market.

The people will have more power in their hands as they will be able to have their own businesses, make their own decisions about it, and make bigger income.

Also, the market will be open, so the people will be able to sell their goods in multiple places, thus getting better offers, and earning more from it.

The competition in the labor force will increase, as the more qualified workers will be preferred as they are more productive, so the labor force will be more efficient, and be able to earn more as well.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the definition of groups of people who traveled the Silk Road together for safety.
likoan [24]
It would be caravans i think
3 0
3 years ago
What is jefksjekgksrg
Ainat [17]

Answer:

A Phase

Explanation: According to my calculations, jefksjekgksrg means when a human is bored and scrambles their fingers across the keyboard.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It was by becoming a Catholic that I pacified the Vendée [region in western France], and a [Muslim] that I established myself in
Readme [11.4K]

Human autonomy is the key concept of Enlightenment ideas. This passage relates to those ideas because Napoleon is refering to the importance of reason over beliefs. When he says "the souls of men proceed along different roads" he is also claiming that any religion is valid to feel close to the creator. In a sense Napoleon makes reference to secularization (the idea of religion and politics should be separated and that one's method of worship should be a private matter). That is why he claims that he could be Catholic, Muslim, or Jew.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Compare the emergence of advanced civilizations in Meso and South America with the four early river valley civilizations. How we
    10·2 answers
  • Which amendment cover more than one right
    13·1 answer
  • Why have eradication efforts failed to eliminate the drug trade? A. The efforts actually made drug crops easier to produce. B. T
    8·2 answers
  • What role did U.S. security forces play in Vietnam during the Kennedy administration?
    14·1 answer
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    6·1 answer
  • According to President Carter, why is the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan a threat to stability? Select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • Which state received the greatest number of immigrants during the 1990s and 2000s
    5·1 answer
  • Which biome covers the largest amount of space in russia?
    6·1 answer
  • All of the following are results of colonialism on Africa's economy EXCEPT _____.
    14·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the emancipation Proclamation?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!