Answer:
There is no chance that a child of one parent who carries CF gene is born having Cystic Fibrosis if the other parent does not carry the CF gene.
Explanation:
Second child born to Chloe’s mother and stepfather will have Cystic Fibrosis only if they inherit one CF gene from each parent. Since stepfather is not carrier of CF gene, development of the disease at child is not possible.
A person who has inherited one CF gene from his/her parent will be a CF gene carrier, but will never develop Cystic Fibrosis. However as he/she a carrier of the CF gene, they can pass it on to their own child.
Answer:
<em>a. Castilla la Mancha</em>
Answer:
engages in more thought before she says something
Explanation:
Public speaking is described as a phenomenon of giving speech "face-to-face" to the different live audience. Thus, because of the evolution of "public speaking", it has been viewed moderately as a specific form of speaking between the speaker and the audience. Fundamentally, public speaking was represented as a part of the "art of persuasion".
Public speaking is often considered as similar to "everyday conversation" as an individual requires to organize his or her thoughts logically or analytically, he or she has to tailor a specific message to his or her audience, he or she needs to tell a story for greatest impact and he or she has to adapt to certain feedback.
<u>Considering the above statement, it could be the reason why "Olive engages in more thought before she says something".</u>
Most likely rivers I’m not completely positive tho
Answer:
C. State constitutions guaranteed individual liberties.
Explanation:
The 1787 ratification of the Constitution of the United States was one of the major issues of discord between the supporters and opposers of the process. They are known as the Federalists and anti-Federalists.
The main argument of the Anti-federalists was that the federal government will have a massive hold over the people and restrict or minimize individual freedom. They believed that this new Constitution will lead to tyranny and reduce the powers of the state. To them, they wanted the division of power between the national and state governments, for a strong national government will only give more power to the President and individual state powers will lead to oppression. So, their argument was for a state government that will guarantee and allow individual liberties.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
