1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maksim231197 [3]
3 years ago
8

What's the best kinda sandwich

Advanced Placement (AP)
2 answers:
jonny [76]3 years ago
8 0
Which ever you like the most...
gregori [183]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Chicken

Explanation:

You might be interested in
¿Què beneficios tienes el volcanismo para la poblacion
weeeeeb [17]
This means "what benefits does the volcanic activity have for the population?" I would say that the main benefit of continental volcanic activity is the expulsion of ash which can enrich the soil and in the tropics make it good for growing coffee, for example, as it does in El Salvador.
6 0
3 years ago
What is dispersal and elevation ?​
Kobotan [32]
Little is known about how mutualistic interactions affect the distribution of species richness on broad geographic scales. Because mutualism positively affects the fitness of all species involved in the interaction, one hypothesis is that the richness of species involved should be positively correlated across their range, especially for obligate relationships. Alternatively, if mutualisms involve multiple mutualistic partners, the distribution of mutualists should not necessarily be related, and patterns in species distributions might be more strongly correlated with environmental factors. In this study, we compared the distributions of plants and vertebrate animals involved in seed‐dispersal mutualisms across the United States and Canada. We compiled geographic distributions of plants dispersed by frugivores and scatter‐hoarding animals, and compared their distribution of richness to the distribution in disperser richness. We found that the distribution of animal dispersers shows a negative relationship to the distribution of the plants that they disperse, and this is true whether the plants dispersed by frugivores or scatter‐hoarders are considered separately or combined. In fact, the mismatch in species richness between plants and the animals that disperse their seeds is dramatic, with plants species richness greatest in the in the eastern United States and the animal species richness greatest in the southwest United States. Environmental factors were corelated with the difference in the distribution of plants and their animal mutualists and likely are more important in the distribution of both plants and animals. This study is the first to describe the broad‐scale distribution of seed‐dispersing vertebrates and compare the distributions to the plants they disperse. With these data, we can now identify locations that warrant further study to understand the factors that influence the distribution of the plants and animals involved in these mutualisms.

Introduction
A central problem in ecology is to understand the patterns and processes shaping the distribution of species. There is a preponderance of studies of species richness at broad geographic scales (Hawkins et al. 2003, Rahbek et al. 2007, Stein et al. 2014, Rabosky and Hurlbert 2015) that has facilitated our understanding of why species are found where they are, a central tenet within the domain of ecology (Scheiner and Willig 2008). Most commonly, these studies find species distributions to be correlated with resource availability and use environmental variables (e.g. temperature and productivity; Rabosky and Hurlbert 2015) to explain putative determinants of the distributions. Environmental variables are only one determinant of species’ distributions. Another, species interaction, is a key and understudied determinant of species’ distributions (Cazelles et al. 2016). In fact, in some cases species interactions may be more important for determining distribution than environmental variables (Fleming 2005).

When species interact, we expect their geographic distributions to be correlated – either positively or negatively – depending on the effect (or sign of the interaction) of one species on the other (Case et al. 2005). For pairwise interactions, where one species benefits from another species, a positive relationship is expected between the distribution and abundance due to the increase in the average fitness of the benefitting species where they overlap (Svenning et al. 2014). Furthermore, most species interactions are not simply pairwise, but diffuse, consisting of multiple interacting species, here referred to as guilds (with guilds referring to species that use the same resource). It therefore follows that where one guild benefits from another guild, a positive relationship is expected between the distribution and richness of the guids. This should be true in the case of mutualisms, where both sides of the interaction share an increase in average fitness from being together (Bronstein 2015), and there is some evidence for correlated geographic distributions of mutualists in the New World (Fleming 2005). One example of a mutualism where both sides of the interaction have a fitness advantage in each other's presence is animal‐mediated seed dispersal. Because both interacting species and guilds in seed dispersal mutualism benefit from the relationship we would predict that the richness of animal‐dispersed plants ought to be correlated with the richness of their animal dispersers and vice versa. To our knowledge, this prediction has never been tested on a large geographic scale.
3 0
3 years ago
To isolate cause and effect, experimenters should use
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

d) random assignment

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The claims Lydia Mariah Child made in her letter to Theodore D. Weld were
Kaylis [27]
I think it is D. Social reform activities during the Second Great Awakening
8 0
3 years ago
Which of these is NOT true about the "Australian ballot"?
nignag [31]

Answer:

B) it is illegal in the United States

Explanation:

The Australian ballot is another name for a "secret ballot." Since people have traditionally liked to keep their political business to themselves, this type of voting is NOT illegal in the U.S.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not an example of a freestanding food and beverage establishment category?
    14·2 answers
  • Upon contact with Europeans, Native American social structures were undermined by...
    10·1 answer
  • How did Wilson’s mobilization efforts reflect progressivism? Explain your reasoning
    9·1 answer
  • What are the similarities between micro teaching and peer teaching
    6·1 answer
  • Define sexual orientation. What environmental factors have been ruled out as contributors to homosexuality? What biological fact
    7·1 answer
  • an increase in the money supply that causes money to lose its purchasing and prices to rise is known as
    15·1 answer
  • People with mental illness have historically been treated with respect and understanding.
    13·2 answers
  • Little Red Riding Hood wants her son to be well-behaved when they go to church. For every five minutes he sits still, she gives
    6·2 answers
  • Which BEST describes China's policy on population growth?
    5·1 answer
  • A large food distributor claims that 45% of all individuals who purchase eggs from its grocery stores choose standard white eggs
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!