Answer:
Both had their own "Personal Rules" Charles from 1629 to 1640 and Cromwell from 16th December 1653 to 3rd September 1654 when they ruled without Parliament. Both had their own council of advisors; Charles had a privy council and Cromwell had a Council of State.
Explanation:
Answer:
all of the above is the answer
Answer:
To justify the Shining Path’s use of violence to achieve its political objectives.
Explanation:
First, some context: the Shining Path was a revolutionary organization that endorsed employed guerrilla tactics and violent terrorism to overthrow the Peruvian government and establish a communist society.
In the interview, Gonzalo is asked about the people’s war. He discusses two of the aspects of this war. To state it simply, there needs to be change in a government.
This idea is used to promote the Shining Path and “demolish the outmoded Peruvian government.”
The Major province of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution was to empower President Johnson to take any necessary steps, which were required to bring security and peace in the South East Asia, not only nationally, but also internationally. The resolution was passed by the Congress in 1964.
Answer
He might ask How did European kings justify their power differently from Asian kings?
Explanation
This is because this is the question which focus on area and includes comparison between the centers of power and ruling he is carrying study on. On this he should examine the type of monarchy each country or king is exercising.This is because there are two types of monarchy.
i) where there is absolute monarchy-this is where there is a sovereign king or queen ;they have total power to govern their kingdom for example in Oman. In absolute the monarch has unlimited power
ii) The other type of monarchy is the constitutional one- This is where the kings or the kingdoms power are are governed by the constitution. a good example is UK. Here the powers are limited by the constitution
