On this day in 1789, George Washington becomes the first and only president to be unanimously elected by the Electoral College. He repeated this notable feat on the same day in 1792.
The peculiarities of early American voting procedure meant that although Washington won unanimous election, he still had a runner-up, John Adams, who served as vice president during both of Washington’s terms. Electors in what is now called the Electoral College named two choices for president. They each cast two ballots without noting a distinction between their choice for president and vice president. Washington was chosen by all of the electors and therefore is considered to have been unanimously elected. Of those also named on the electors’ ballots, Adams had the most votes and became vice president.
Although Washington’s overwhelming popularity prevented problems in 1789 and 1792, this procedure caused great difficulty in the elections of 1796 and 1800. In 1796, Federalist supporters of John Adams cast only one of their two votes in an effort to ensure that Adams would win the presidency without giving votes to any of the other candidates. This led to a situation in which the Federalist Adams won the highest number of votes and became president, but Thomas Jefferson, the opposing Democratic-Republican candidate, came in second and therefore became his opponent’s vice president.
In 1800, the system led to a tie between the Democratic-Republican candidates for president and vice president, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr. This sent the vote to the House of Representatives, where Federalists voted for Burr instead of Jefferson, whom they despised. As a result, the Congressional vote ended in a tie 35 times before the Federalists decided to hand in blank ballots and concede the White House to Jefferson.
In 1804, the 12th Amendment to the Constitution ended this particular form of electoral chaos by stipulating that separate votes be cast for president and vice president.
Hope this helped!!!
Answer:
As Mr.Edmund Burke was an American revolutionist he defended the revolution in United States. The type of mentality that he had about the revolution inside the United States was way different then it was in the french revolution by the french leaders.
Explanation:
<u>The Heart of the Matter:</u>
As analyses of the french revolution is very much valid,as there were no clear signs to end violence, corruption in the system, or putting a full stop to the everlasting war going on among the departments of the system. The analysts accuse the french leader of never prioritizing there national interest. But, most of people were corrupt and there was no strong system to defend its people but ruins of the so called government was left. As people were murdered and the crime rate was on peak due to weak institutions inside the State system.
While, the revolution inside the US was much different people were provided there basic rights and they had a protection been provided by the system.Unlike in the french revolution where people did left a scratch of the state treasury and destroyed the whole system. It was all due to the corrupt system and weak politics in France in that time which then ended soon.
Bamboo and feces.... gross
Yes, he was the president, because President Roosevelt died, and Harry Truman took his place in result of his death.
b. antagonized jesuit and dominican astronomers.
