1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shalnov [3]
3 years ago
6

How does Williams set up a contrast between birth and death in "Landscape

History
2 answers:
marishachu [46]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Williams starts the poem with the stark contrast between Icarus' falling and the spring, which immediately evokes the paradox which is at the poem's core: birth and death are two sides of the same coin. Then he gradually develops the spring motif as a metaphor of birth, abundance, and profusion. When the image of pageantry "concerned with itself" comes to a climax, we are reminded again of the birth/death contrast - the sun, which nurtures the whole nature, melts the wings of a flying boy, causing his drowning. The whole poem, short as it is, is an expanded contrast between rising and falling, thriving and dying.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/4388317#readmore

zysi [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

By telling the reader that "it was spring".

Explanation:

William Carlos William's poem "Landscape With the Fall of Icarus" is in relation with the painting of the with the same title by Pieter Bruegel. It talks of the fall of Icarus from the sky and the moment of his fall into the water.

Opening the poem with the lines "<em>When Icarus fell, it was spring</em>", Williams presented a stark contrasted picture. This contrasted picture also point to the image of the two stages of life and death, birth and death being the two sides of humanity. Spring represents the abundance, the start and colorful beginning while the fall represents a fall from life, a metaphor of death. Thus, the poem, short as it may seem, is a representation of the contrasting nature of living and dying, birth and death.

You might be interested in
Which best compares the attitudes of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis about Fort Sumter? Lincoln was eager to fight at Fort S
shutvik [7]

The correct answer is "Lincoln did not want armed conflict at Fort Sumter, but Davis acted quickly to cripple Union forces".

Lincoln was certainly adamant about avoiding military confrontation over the Fort. <u>His aims were put in preserving the Union</u>, <u>which proved to be extremely hard as the conflicts were started by the sates that had separated or seceded</u>, as well as the first attacks on Fort Sumter.

Davis cared a lot less about preservation and just tried to find <u>the quickest and most effective way to mitigate the conflict</u>. He believed crippling the Union's army would make them leave as they would not have enough time to respond and they'd be at a great disadvantage.


Hope this helps!

4 0
4 years ago
Razones por las cuales la independencia es mala
maks197457 [2]
Las razones por las que la independencia es mala es porque no podrá pedir ayuda, se sentirá solo y es posible que no sea tan eficaz como cree. (Sorry if the translation is not the best)
6 0
4 years ago
What makes sea travel from the west to India easier in the warmer months? (hint: seasonal winds)
Alexxx [7]

Monsoons winds!!

Explanation:

these help provide India the weather they need and blows from the sea towards the land instead of from the land to the sea like in winter times ! it helps settlers land better and it isn't as violent when they do pass by!

4 0
3 years ago
How might a Wampanoag historians versions of events differ from Bradford
babymother [125]
Much of what is known about early Wampanoag history comes from archaeological evidence, the Wampanoag oral tradition (much of which has been lost), and documents created by seventeenth-century English colonists. The Wampanoag people have lived in southeastern New England for thousands of years. In 1600 there were as many as 12,000 Wampanoag who lived in forty villages. Both oral tradition and archaeological evidence suggests that Native peoples lived in the area for 10,000 years. Wampanoag means “People of the Dawn” in the Algonquian language. There were sixty-seven tribes and bands of the Wampanoag Nation. Three epidemics swept across New England between 1614 and 1620, killing many Native peoples. Some villages were entirely wiped out (such as Patuxet). When the colonists we now call Pilgrims arrived in 1620, there were fewer than 2,000 Wampanoag. After English colonists settled in Massachusetts, epidemics continued to reduce the Wampanoag to 1,000 by 1675. Only 400 survived King Philip’s War. Today there are 3,000 Wampanoag who are organized in five groups: Assonet, Gay Head, Herring Pond, Mashpee, and Namasket. EUROPEAN COLONISTS
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a sooner
bogdanovich [222]
The answer is
1) A homesteader making a life on the plains
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Need a history scentence about the declaration of independence
    6·1 answer
  • Which book dramatized conflicts over land between railroad companies and
    15·1 answer
  • Upon reaching sexual maturity, male dogs and cats may mark their territory through
    14·2 answers
  • What is the element of foreshadowing "They leaped like deer on the moon"
    15·1 answer
  • Compare how native Americans and early explorers used natural resources in America
    10·1 answer
  • If you tell me <br> who did 9/11?<br> ill be your best dad<br> dy white power
    13·2 answers
  • ¿en que se diferenciaban la monarquía constitucional y absoluta?
    9·1 answer
  • Changing which factor would NOT have an influence on the kinetic energy of a moving van loaded with 100 kg bags mulch of with a
    15·2 answers
  • What was a cause of the economic problems of the United States in the 1780s
    11·2 answers
  • What made Africa desirable to the French during the Age of Exploration?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!