1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexxx [7]
3 years ago
7

How might a Wampanoag historians versions of events differ from Bradford

History
2 answers:
babymother [125]3 years ago
6 0
Much of what is known about early Wampanoag history comes from archaeological evidence, the Wampanoag oral tradition (much of which has been lost), and documents created by seventeenth-century English colonists. The Wampanoag people have lived in southeastern New England for thousands of years. In 1600 there were as many as 12,000 Wampanoag who lived in forty villages. Both oral tradition and archaeological evidence suggests that Native peoples lived in the area for 10,000 years. Wampanoag means “People of the Dawn” in the Algonquian language. There were sixty-seven tribes and bands of the Wampanoag Nation. Three epidemics swept across New England between 1614 and 1620, killing many Native peoples. Some villages were entirely wiped out (such as Patuxet). When the colonists we now call Pilgrims arrived in 1620, there were fewer than 2,000 Wampanoag. After English colonists settled in Massachusetts, epidemics continued to reduce the Wampanoag to 1,000 by 1675. Only 400 survived King Philip’s War. Today there are 3,000 Wampanoag who are organized in five groups: Assonet, Gay Head, Herring Pond, Mashpee, and Namasket. EUROPEAN COLONISTS
Greeley [361]3 years ago
4 0

History viewed from a Wampanoag perspective would view events from the Native American's side of things, where the account of William Bradford would see things through the eyes of the settlers who came from England to establish Plymouth Colony.

William Bradford, governor of Plymouth Colony, provided his version of events in his journal, titled, <em>Of Plymouth Plantation.  </em>As an example, we can look at Bradford's account regarding what we think of as "the first Thanksgiving" in America.  Bradford focused on the gratitude of the pilgrims after surviving a harsh winter and the loss of many lives, to enjoy their first harvest season in the New World.  The 53 English settlers  at the first Thanksgiving were those of an original group of 102 pilgrims who had survived the Mayflower's journey from Europe to America, and the difficulties of disease and winter that followed.   These settlers were deeply religious people who believed their move to Plymouth Colony was all part of God's plan.

The Wampanoag were an existing nation of dozens of villages throughout the region that today we call Massachusetts and Rhode Island.  When Europeans arrived, germs previously unknown on this continent arrived with them, and the Wampanoag suffered much from disease also -- at a time when their people already had been enduring difficult times.  They were a people who believed in maintaining a relationship with the land and nature. They had long had their own habits of thanksgiving observances to show their gratitude for what nature provided to them.  When the Europeans arrived, the Wampanoag proposed to help provide the settlers with food in exchange for the advanced weapons the Englishmen had.  The peaceful image of a Thanksgiving shared between the English and the Wampanoag was a rare moment of peaceful coexistence between native peoples and European settlers.

As historians, we always want to consider all perspectives on a topic.  Any persons undertaking to write about history are themselves embedded in their own time periods and cultures.  Those cultural perspectives influence their understanding and interpretation of the events they experience or write about.  

You might be interested in
Trace the development of Japan during the late-19th and early- 20th centuries. How did these developments contribute to Japan's
weqwewe [10]
Do you need the dates? I am not a pro of historical dates :(.

Early 19th century: Japan is under a very strict isolationist policy. The country is basically locked down in order to protect the Tokugawa shogunate's supremacy. The Japanese culture is flourishing, but the technology is about the same as when Japan started its isolation, near 1600 (basically, katanas and muskets)

1866: American Admiral Matthew Perry asks the Shogun to reopen the country by entering Tokyo's harbour with heavy warships. Intimidated by the size of these ships (the Japanese must've felt like if the aliens from Independence day showed up and asked the president to "trade" with them). A year later, the Shogun ended the Japanese isolationism.

Late 19th century: The influence of International traders and visitors shakes the Japanese social structure. The Samurai class, namely, sees these reforms as a menace to their aristocratic power and privilege. Some of them believe that the Shogun is too keen on adopting the European's reform, and try to re-instate the Emperor, the religious leader of shinto, as the ruler of Japan. A few civil wars later, the Emperor is the new leader of Japan (Meiji Restoration). But the Japanese realizes that, if they wish to still be major players in this more interconnected world, they will need to get their military and technology up to date.

Even later 19th century: Japan basically absorb 200 years of technological progress in 30 years. Japan quickly adapts to the modern tactics and weapons, and starts building an empire by invading small Pacific Island and Korea. They later invade Manchuria, were they get in a struggle with Russia for the domination of the territory. A war broke out in 1904-1905, and Japans comes out victorious. This is very important, since it shows that Japan has the potential to rival a European power, which is surprising to the colonizing Europeans.

WW1: Japan profits from WW1 to invade and conquer some Pacific Island belonging to the Germans by joining the Entente. They join the League of Nation, truly defining them as an international player.

1930's: The Great Depression hits Japan's economy pretty hard. Japan decides to redress it's economy by strengthening their military and trying to build an empire spanning across the Pacific. They leave the League of Nation because of their War Mongering.

Pre-American WW2: Japan expands its territory by invading China and a lot of Pacific Islands. This War-Mongering starts to stress the American, which holds territories, protectorates and states under their influence in the regions (Guam, Hawaii, the Philippines...) decides to stop sending oil to Japan. Since the US sent almost 80% of Japan's oil, the Japanese war effort is effectively slowed down. In their militaristic thinking inherited by spending a lot of the last 80 years fighting, having a feudal leader as their head of state and being confident on their capacity of defeating an occidental nation, they try to intimidate the US by attacking the base of Pearl Harbour. This mesure did not only failed to intimidate the US, but encouraged them to break from isolationism and join WW2 to exact vengeance. So you could say Pearl Harbour's attack kinda backfired

TL;DR: Japan turned into a militaristic powerhouse in a very short amount of time while having a feudal leader. This turned them into a very war-like nation during the 20th century.

I'm sorry if my orthograph/syntax/english in general is not perfect, French is my native language.
4 0
3 years ago
What is the three-fifths compromise and what was its purpose?
creativ13 [48]

Answer:

If the diameter of a microscope's field is 0.12mm, how wide is an object that fills one-quarter of the field?  (Explain how you've reached your answer.)

You can claim 40 points, just go to my page and write your answer + explanation.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the US coastline provide an advantage for the South during the Civil War?
goldenfox [79]

Answer:  

Southerners enjoyed the initial advantage of morale: The South was fighting to maintain its way of life, whereas the North was fighting to maintain a union. Slavery did not become a moral cause of the Union effort until Lincoln announced the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.

Explanation:

none needed!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What problems can monsoons cause?
Lapatulllka [165]
Monsoons can cause many different problems but perhaps the most devastating are the floods that can take up an entire city which leads to isolation and sickness. 
4 0
3 years ago
) How are cooperatives similar to non-profit organizations?
zhenek [66]

Answer: A nonprofit organization that is tax-exempt appears similar to a cooperative that operates on “not-for-profit” basis and doesn't pay taxes on some of its earnings. Both nonprofits and cooperatives can have members and use member-based governance.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the Grand Banks area:<br><br> coastal plain<br> lowland<br> mountain<br> tundra
    11·1 answer
  • According to your understanding of the lesson, the President is responsible for which of the following? Select all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • Who were the opposing sides in the War of Jenkins' Ear?
    7·2 answers
  • Children would often be used for all the following except what?
    14·1 answer
  • A lighthouse was 1,000 meters inland on a coast when it was built. After 100 years it was 10 meters inland. What most likely cha
    8·2 answers
  • After Lewis and Clark expedition Thomas Jefferson sent Richard sparks with a group to explore the ____ in 1806. Another expediti
    13·1 answer
  • Which are accurate descriptions of how the Christian church influenced daily life in the Middle Ages? Choose all answers that ar
    7·2 answers
  • Which phrase is the best definition for the word “tort?”
    13·2 answers
  • Why does designating the act of lynching a hate crime prove to be important ?
    12·1 answer
  • Step 1- Select three sites to review:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!