1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiv31 [10]
4 years ago
8

how did the South Atlantic system create an interconnected Atlantic world and how did the system impact development in the Briti

sh colonies
History
2 answers:
baherus [9]4 years ago
6 0
Basically, the Americas were harvesting resources from mines and fields and these raw resources would be taken to Europe. Then things would be manufactured and these things would be traded for more slaves in Africa. Then the slaves would be taken from Africa across the Atlantic to the Americas where they would get even more raw resources. All three continents were connected and developed due to the trade, and this made the British colonies richer.
<span />
dmitriy555 [2]4 years ago
4 0

The South Atlantic system created an interconnected Atlantic world through trading between continents. The system gave impact to the British colonies development in industrialization (increased their economies).

 

EXPLANATION  

The latest development in early modern history is the existence of the Atlantic World. This term generally covers western Europe, West Africa, North, South, America, and the Caribbean islands. This shows the development of open relations between various geographical regions.

The South Atlantic system makes the Atlantic world connected with European investors and traders. They finance the production of tobacco, sugar and other commodities. European demand for sugar and African demand for manufactured products, rum and weapons require an exchange. Africa became a supplier of slaves. These slaves brought to the Atlantic world.

The above system is also the main cause of British "industrialization". However, the progress of the UK economy is also made possible by many other factors, including the advancement of agriculture, technology, the stability of political institutions, the availability of local materials such as coal, and a culture conducive to innovation and business. It can be concluded that if there were no slave trade in Britain and throughout Europe, Europe would still be "industrializing" (slavery was not the only cause).

There are still two more points to note. First, if the slave trade became the "motor" that drove industrialization, Portugal should have been the main industrial power, given its long-standing involvement in the slave trade. But the reality is the opposite, Portugal became one of the countries with the most backward industrial economies in Europe.

The second point, if the slave trade was important for the development of the European economy, this interest was diminished when the slave trade was abolished in the mid-19th century. The elimination did not have much impact on the European economy. On the contrary, industrialization continued to move forward to spread to other parts of Europe. This is added to the terrible wave of technological progress.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• How did the south Atlantic system affect the British economy: brainly.com/question/13123300

KEYWORD: South Atlantic System, British, Colony  

Subject: History

Class: 10 - 12

Subchapter: South Atlantic System

You might be interested in
What ended the reign of the Romanov family?
NeTakaya

The Bolshevik Revolution. Although WW1 was the catalyst that did lead to their downfall.

3 0
4 years ago
Why was the recreation of Belgium important in the failure of the schlieffen plan<br>​
sergejj [24]

<h2><u>Explanation:</u></h2>

There were a lot of factors -- most were not what Schlieffen expected.

1. France wasn't that easy to conquer. It took longer than Schlieffen thought.

2. Belgium did not respond the way Schlieffen expected. They fought Germany.

3. Russia was more flexible that Schlieffen thought. They mobilized quicker and were much more adept at using their forces.

4. In all, Schlieffen made plans that were inflexible and did not account for the way wars are actually fought.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main reason Theodore Roosevelt built the Panama Canal?
inna [77]

Answer:

A)To connect the Atlantic and Pacific for military and merchant reasons

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best completes the chart: Social Structure of the Aztec Empire.
pychu [463]

Answer:

that would be <em>Merchants and Artisans</em>

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Their backs had been made familiar with the bloody lash, so that they had become callous; mine was yet tender; for while at Balt
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

Tender

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A major goal of Joseph Stalin's five- year plans was to
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an advantage that Bantu-speaking farmers had in their encounters with gathering and hunting groups?
    7·1 answer
  • What would happen if all the aquifers in Texas dried up? How can we prevent that from happening? PLS ANWSER ASAP
    11·1 answer
  • What was one major result of the Salerno invasion?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following was one of the outcomes at Potsdam?
    15·2 answers
  • 8. In 1820, how much of the country's African American population was enslaved? A. 95 percent B. 65 percent C. 45 percent D. 85
    9·1 answer
  • Need help pleaseeeee
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me
    7·1 answer
  • Please write a title for the cartoon on<br> the page.
    12·2 answers
  • 1.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!