Answer:
So the UN managed to assemble a combined military force of many different nations to hold back the North Korean army. This was possible because of the activity in the council by its member states, and because of the change of rhetoric since the beginning of the 20th century.
The League of Nations was formed as a predecessor to the UN and partly NATO, but it was wildly ineffective. None of the member states were willing to commit military forces to the council to enforce peace and it was all mostly influenced by the isolationism of the US and the appeasement and neutrality policy of the Allies. So basically the UN is a revamped version of the League of Nations because it is more effective and it is forcing member states to participate while the League of Nations did not manage to do that. And it is important to note that the North Korean crisis was stopped because of the military intervention of the UN. While the League of Nations would have done basically nothing if they still existed at that point.
Central powers: (WW1)
Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey
Axis Powers: (WW2)
Germany, Italy, and Japan
My teach told me as well put the central powers just in case.
Sorry if I am wrong.
It gave women work because of all the lives lost
Answer:
Popular sovereignty was seen on the issue of slavery as a political middle ground. Popular sovereignty is the principle that people should rule, and as such the status of slavery should be determined by the votes of local settlers and not congress.
During the Mexican War, when slavery became a political problem, Douglas faced a challenge. Fearing that the issue would interfere with the Constitution, he argued for the doctrine of popular sovereignty — the right of the people of a state or territory to determine for themselves the question of slavery — as a solution for the sake of the Union. He led the congressional struggle for the 18th compromise.