The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
The answer is <u>"c. a confounding variable is an explanatory variable that was considered in a study whose effect cannot be distinguished from a second explanatory variable in the study."</u>
A confounding variable is an outside impact that progressions the impact of a dependent and independent variable. This superfluous impact is utilized to impact the result of an exploratory plan. Just, a confounding variable is an additional variable went into the condition that was not represented. Confounding variables can destroy an analysis and deliver pointless outcomes. They propose that there are connections when there truly are most certainly not. In an examination, the independent variable by and large affects the dependent variable.
Answer:
"Overconfident" is the appropriate solution.
Explanation:
- Global competition requires constant development teaching methods to respond to order to bring about changes throughout the future.
- There seem to be issues surrounding organizations when competing internationally, although to be able to succeed, they just had to charge customer's attention to the unique dissimilarities.
So that the above is the correct approach.
Answer:
D - death of a teenager in an automobile crash
Explanation:
An autopsy is performed only when the cause of death is unknown or not fully correct. The situations in answer choices A, B, and C each create a mysterious reason for death.
Answer choice D, however, is an easily and obviously identifiable cause of death and, therefore, would not require the use of an autopsy.
Hope this helps you! Have an amazing day :)
Helloooo no answer choices??
