<span>Yes the United States federal government
should reduce the progressive income tax rates in favor of an introduction of a
regressive national sales tax. Hence, since U.S progressive income tax means
income redistribution that most taxes are used to fund social welfare programs
however only a small portion of government spending is devoted to welfare
payments. Example of this progressive taxes reduction is the sales tax. Moreover,
If the two individuals buy the same amount of goods or services, the sales tax
constitute a higher percentage of the lower-earning individual’s wages and a lower
percentage of the higher-earning individual’s wages. </span>
The correct answer is letter A
The technique is computationally intensive, due to the exhaustive search for sub-regions and the generating, in order to provide the best filling in other regions of the image. This research proposes a new form of compression based on that, using the sequence of points generated by the iteration of it. Understanding a TA as a dynamic system in discrete time, each new point identified is a direct consequence of the iteration of the TA over the previous point, allowing the capture of similarities in this sequence of points. By saving the AT coefficients and the initial coordinates, it is possible to reconstruct the image by the AT iteration from the starting point.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
