SIMILARITIES
<span>-Both have an instruction for judges, police officers, and witnesses </span>
<span>-Both set regulations and establish wages and prices </span>
<span>-Both punished criminals </span>
<span>-Both had a certain set of right </span>
<span>DIFFERENCES </span>
<span>-US constitution allows more leniency and freedom to it's American citizens like freedom of speech and religion. The Code of Hammurabi (COH) does not. </span>
<span>-COH was very barbaric compared to US constitution </span>
<span>[e.g.) If a man kills another man's son his son shall be cut off. </span>
<span>-If a son slaps his father, his hand shall be cut off.] --->>> These things DO not exist in the constitution. </span>
Both yes and no. Yes as in the massacre happened and many of the people shot civilians during the massacre. They weren't as in Captain Preston was found not guilty and many historians believe that he did not order the soldiers to attack but that the soldiers attacked of their own free will. There are even many who claim that it was self defense and that nobody was guilty except for the colonists.
Answer:
Strengthen the economies of europe.
Explanation:
just took the test and got 100
Perhaps the most single valuable authority you have as president in this way is to issue an executive order, which can commit troops to a conflict for a limited about of time without Congressional approval. Tools of foreign policy would include sending in diplomats to try to negotiate peaceful terms.
