1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zavuch27 [327]
3 years ago
14

Should I go in favor or against parliament's right to tax the colonists

History
1 answer:
Bond [772]3 years ago
3 0
Yes you should yes.yes.
You might be interested in
How did the sit-ins in Greensboro, North Carolina, influence people around the country?
Snezhnost [94]

The Greensboro Sit-In was a critical turning point in black history and American history, bringing the fight for civil rights to the national stage. Its use of nonviolence inspired the Freedom Riders and others to take up the cause of integration in the South, furthering the cause of equal rights in the United States.

5 0
3 years ago
What was the result of America's actions in Guatemala?
larisa86 [58]
The start of thirty years of military rule
5 0
3 years ago
To what extent did north america participate in the enlightenment
Delicious77 [7]
Well, freedom was a pretty important aspect of the enlightenment. It was in fact during this enlightenment era that American fought for and gain its independence. The declaration of Independence was very much influenced by Enlightenment philosopher, John Locke's ideas on human independence.


You can look up how John Locke influenced the US Declaration of Independence
6 0
3 years ago
Diferencia entre juzgar y explicar
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

<em>(English) The only difference between a judgment and an opinion is the existence of evidence to support an opinion therefore making it final or absolute. There is nothing wrong with a judgment of this type, however, the problem arises when we judge others in an aggressive tone.</em>

<em></em>

<em>(Spanish) La única diferencia entre un juicio y una opinión es la existencia de evidencia para respaldar una opinión, por lo que es definitiva o absoluta. No hay nada de malo en un juicio de este tipo, sin embargo, el problema surge cuando juzgamos a los demás en un tono agresivo.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
How did the bill or rights legally change the political system in england?
Helga [31]

The bill of rights (1689) guaranteed parliamentary rights that needed to be respected by the monarchs. It meant, a constitutional monarchy, where the power of the monarchs was limited by the Bill of Rights that protected the authority of Parliament.  



3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the goal of the Boxer Rebellion? A. to regain control of Manchuria B. to remove foreign influence from China C. to supp
    7·1 answer
  • The samurai warriors of feudal japan resemble the knights of medieval europe in many respects. which of the following characteri
    9·2 answers
  • Who did the romans borrow their philosophy from?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes how the people of South Carolina responded to the formation of the sons of liberty ?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following were not one of the major cash crops for plantations?
    11·2 answers
  • What constitutional amendment was passed during the progressive era authorizing Congress to collect an income tax?
    12·1 answer
  • MARKING AS BRAINLIEST!!!!!!
    11·2 answers
  • What time period does The American Cyclopaedia call the “Dark Ages?”
    5·1 answer
  • Under which type of imperial rule would Westerners run the government within the colony? A. direct rule B. indirect rule C. sphe
    5·1 answer
  • Who were the early inhabitants of Australia?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!