Answer:
D. Europe sank into a period of less intellectual discovery and artistic achievement.
Explanation:
That is the opposite of the renaissance
Answer:
The ability of ecotourism to protect both people and places is an unresolved, and growing, concern. Commodification of host culture and environment is a widely reported social impact of tourism and spawns an array of implications regarding indigenous people's view of their places and themselves. The degree of impact from ecotourism development is related to the degree of market development within the indigenous community and their state of decline regarding natural resource scarcity. Pre-existing power differentials between local people and other groups may be exacerbated by ecotourism development. To protect both people and their places, native people's claim to control should be legitimized by conservation and government authorities, particularly indigenous people's role in technical management of the protected area. Regional and national government controls are relevant at the inception of ecotourism development, but ultimately should be reduced to one of infrastructure planning and coordination.
Explanation:
Answer:
Because he thought that it is better to ensure that people understood the main reasons why Martin and the other parts of the movement did what they did.
Explanation:
In writing the letter, King tried his best possible to explain the main points why he drafted the letter. He wanted to share the vital information about Martin and the movements by others with the public to ensure that they understood the main reasons why they performed the specific actions. Thus, he put the main points in the beginning of the letter.
