Can you please post the question?
<span>It means that citizens "cannot be </span>compelled
to affirm and testify against them, leaving the weight of demonstrating that a man has
carried out a wrongdoing to the administration".
<span>At a
criminal trial, it isn't just the respondent who appreciates the Fifth Amendment
right not to affirm. Witnesses who are called to the testimony box can decline
to answer certain inquiries if replying would ensnare them in a criminal
action.</span>
Answer: because there are too many opinions and it is hard to decide what to agree on so having separate parties makes it easier for people to vote and decide accurately
Explanation:
There exist factors endogenous to all modern Arab monarchical regimes to which we can attribute their resilience in the face of the Arab Spring. The first and perhaps the most important of these in the context of the Arab Spring is that all of the eight monarchies existing today are able to foster a degree of legitimacy in their governance that presidents cannot attest to, deeming the overthrow of the monarchy in the name of democratization a more formidable task that is less imaginable by their people. Furthermore, varying structural factors of the regimes also play a significant role in their resilience. In general, the survival of monarchical regimes is contingent on their institutional flexibility in attentive management of the regime’s coalition of supporters and society at large. The eight modern Arab monarchies vary, however, in their relationship between the regime coalition and society, leading to varying survival strategies.
Answer: False
Some slaves died back then trying to resist.
