Sometimes, reading things out loud can help a lot. "I had eat all the leftovers." Does that sound right? How about "I had eating all the leftovers," or "I had ate all the leftovers"? What about "I had eaten all the leftovers"?
If this doesn't work for you, think of it like this: you must always use the PAST PARTICIPLE after a form of the word "have." For example, "I had given you the present." Which of your options is most similar? Most likely, the answer is "eaten": "I confessed that I had eaten all the leftovers."
Answer: B. Eaten
Answer: number
Explanation: it would be the word NUMBER that would be written on the blank line
Answer:
An inverted pyramid
Explanation:
The questions to ask when writing a structure is Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How. You can make an inverted pyramid on all three corners and sides of that triangle. With that pyramid, it is easier to figure out what you might have missed on a paper, or essay est.
The plural form is potatoes
Answer:
The author, Mike Kubic, has a negative tone towards the American Electoral college system in his 2016 article <em>The American Electoral Process.</em>
He is describing how it is unfair, costly, convoluted, not-entirely democratic, and with dubious results.
- Unfair, because of the fact that some states (primarily, smaller ones) have more representatives per capita than their bigger counterparts.
- Costly, because the candidates spend millions, if not billions of dollars running their campaigns.
- Convoluted, because it takes many months, if not years to prepare.
- Not-entire democratic, because the people don't vote for the president directly, but rather for representatives who will then choose the president.
- With dubious results, because of the "super delegates" as well as the case of George W. Bush v. AL Gore he mentions in the article.
He uses many rhetorical strategies to support his perspective, primarily ethos: using quotes, numbers, and statistics to depict the unfairness of the system.