The author, Mike Kubic, has a negative tone towards the American Electoral college system in his 2016 article <em>The American Electoral Process.</em>
He is describing how it is unfair, costly, convoluted, not-entirely democratic, and with dubious results.
Unfair, because of the fact that some states (primarily, smaller ones) have more representatives per capita than their bigger counterparts.
Costly, because the candidates spend millions, if not billions of dollars running their campaigns.
Convoluted, because it takes many months, if not years to prepare.
Not-entire democratic, because the people don't vote for the president directly, but rather for representatives who will then choose the president.
With dubious results, because of the "super delegates" as well as the case of George W. Bush v. AL Gore he mentions in the article.
He uses many rhetorical strategies to support his perspective, primarily ethos: using quotes, numbers, and statistics to depict the unfairness of the system.
A calendar will not be helpful in planning your study schedule. The date your Science project is due should be recorded on a daily organizer. Sometimes when people procrastinate, they do unimportant tasks before the important ones. The dates of Spring Break should be included on your weekly calendar.
Answer: you need to take in that there might be counter arguments you need to have proof or evidence of some sort, and you also need strong visual language.
