I actually believe the correct answer is an adverb clause modifying was.
A is incorrect because the first clause is subordinate; B is incorrect because there is no noun clause in this sentence; C is incorrect because the word modifying school is an adjective, but not an adjective clause; this leaves us with D. We can see the adverb clause 'when the Little Red Schoolhouse began to give way to the consolidated school in the 1920s' which modifies the verb 'was.'
Answer:
They expanded the definition of the right to free speech beyond the spoken word
Explanation:
"Tinker v. Des Moines case" was all about the<em> black armbands</em> that a group of students wore as a form of expression in <em>protesting against the war</em><em> </em><em>that was happening in Vietnam. </em>They were suspended and this sparked a debate regarding the "freedom of speech" enclosed in the <em>Constitution.</em><em> </em>
As a result, <em>the right to free speech</em> was properly addressed by the Supreme Court as something that will allow the students to express themselves<u> without affecting the policy of the school.</u>
So, this explains the answer.
Explanation:
its a metaphor bc it didnt use like or as
Answer: Man vs Man
Explanation:
It was the main character (The author I’m guessing) against her family and or just Nora.
<u>Answer:
</u>
2 goes into 3 exactly 1.5 times.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- If the question statement is put in other words, the same question could be asked as to how much is three divided by two?
- In an attempt to elucidate the problem, we can say that when a whole of two goes into three, it can be counted as two gone into three for one time.
- And for the 'one' that remains from which two did not go, it can be said that half of two can go through it.
- Hence, two goes into three exactly one and a half times.
