Civil rights movement in the Unites States of America showed that civil disobedience brings the legislative changes, successfully. Any type of injustice, if not tolerated and a voice is raised, then even the governments have to listen and amend the laws.
Answer:
Committees are an essential part of the legislative process. ... Of all the measures sent to committees, only a small percentage are considered. By considering and reporting on a bill, committees help to set the Senate's agenda. When a committee or subcommittee decides to consider a measure, it usually takes four actions.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
The title tells you what information the map is displaying. A Legend is used to explain symbols and colors on a map.
Explanation:
Answer:
With the growth of the internet, the easiest way to participate in politics is <u>making financial contributions.</u>
Explanation:
People´s commitment to activelty participate in politics is less and less seen. Statistics say the least common way of political participation is attending to a protest. So this is one argument to think people do not participate in person, but they can make financial contributios from the confort of their home.
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
