Analyzing the scenario, we see that the situation is repeated by the second. It may be that the first time, the woman did not know. But she had already been accused before, that is, that the second time, this was considered intentional and malicious conduct.
According to the penal code § 594, this act is considered vandalism, that is the defacing of another’s property with graffiti “or other inscribed material,” or damaging or destroying another’s property and this cant be done negligently, with the will to do the damage.
If she convicted of felony vandalism again, the maximum prison sentence is three years (after being convicted before) and fines can be up to $10,000. When the damage caused by the vandalism exceeds $10,000, the fines can be increased to $50,000. Then, comes the restitution (paying the owner property for the damage), and possibly community service.
Answer:
I would assume it would be the second sentence. I would see the picture that well but from what i could see, that would probably be the most reasonable answer....if it is wrong then I am sooo sorry.
Explanation:
Answer is: Anti-Corn Law League (<span>industrial middle class), because they wanted free trade.
</span>Anti-Corn Law League was<span> British organization founded in 1839 who fought England’s </span>Corn Laws, because <span>laws were morally wrong and economically bad.</span>
Corn Law are<span> regulations governing the import and export of </span>grain.
Aryans, number 6, i hope its correct!
1) Pay off the national debt at face value and have the federal government assume the war debts of the states. 2) Protect the young nations “infant” (new and developing) industries and collect adequate revenues at the same time by imposing high tariffs on imported goods. 3) Create a national bank for depositing government fund and printing banknotes that would provide the basis for a stable U.S. currency.
