1. The names of the more vital characters. Rainsford, Whitney, General Zaroff, Ivan. Just to name a few, if not all.
2. Rainsford and Whitney are hunters. They admit to being hunters and looking for good hunt where they intend to be heading right from the beginning. They also mention moose and jaguar hunting.
3. Rainsford does not believe animals have the same type of feelings as people do. He believes the world is made up into two classes: the hunters and huntees. This is something he mentions to Whitney. He also believes that humans are the hunters.
4. Rainsford and Whitney are traveling by boat. Rainsford falls overboard and has the capacity and strength to swim all the way to shore. He is not where he intended to land while originally traveling on the ship.
5. Rainsford does not think people should hunt people.
6. Ivan is a Cossack.
7. Sanger Rainsford has written a book before about hunting. General Zaroff has admitted to reading it. This is not something you have to assume.
8. During the hunt, General Zaroff has every intention of killing Rainsford if he catches him. Zaroff does not win the game.
Some personification that I see are..
"The brush grabbed at his legs in the dark..."
"The high mountain wind coasted sighing through the pass and whistled on the edges..."
Answer:
it is the second one Mrs. Elliott's class is working on semicolons, Mrs. Marshall's class is working on fractions
Explanation:
Answer:
spends his free time with his sons
Explanation:
right on edge
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals is known to have denied McMillian's appeal even when Stevenson had made his argument that there was no reliable corroboration of Myers' testimony and also under Alabama law.
- The reason is that the State could not depend totally on the testimony given by an accomplice, as there was an incidence of prosecutorial misconduct and also racially discriminatory jury.
- Yes, he seems more reliable as a witness now than when he was put on the stand based on the fact that he was not influenced into giving any kind of fabrication of facts but due to his stand to tell the truth.
- Payne vs. Tennessee is known to be a 1991 case that decided that a testimony given in the form of a victim impact statement can be taken in or admissible in any kind of sentencing stage of any trial and also in death penalty cases. I believe it is good or justified.
Thinking back to chapter 5 of "Just Mercy" i am hopefully now for Walter’s release because he is innocent and deserve to be given justice.
<h3>What is the message of Just Mercy about?</h3>
Just Mercy is a book written by Bryan Stevenson and talks about his wrongful conviction and his fight for his freedom.
The book centers around America's faulted criminal justice system and makes us as humans to tackle these inequality and injustice.
Learn more about Just Mercy from
brainly.com/question/25480701
