How is the chorus different from a modern-day omniscient narrator?Antigone

1 answer:

6 0

The difference between a chorus and a modern-day omniscient narrator is that a chorus is made up of a group of people who would sing while describing scenes, often providing another point of view to the audience. They were actors who would not take part in the action but would stand on the edges of the acting space and addressed the audience directly between scenes. It is believed that this practice was derived from religious ceremonies where groups of individuals along with a priest would perform an action that is important to the group.

You might be interested in

If an author mentions a world leader or a famous event, the reader will be able to determine the time of the story.

IrinaK [193]

True. An author will only mention a famous person/event assuming his/her audience will be familiar with them/it.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You best friend cheated you. You always considered him/her to be a true friend and very honest. Express your conflicting emotion

Degger [83]

Wednesday, 18 May, 2022

Time - 2:47 PM

Dear Diary,

Today, Something unexpected happened in my life that I never thought of. I have lost a very good friend of mine because he wasn't good at all. This thing is about the time when I and my friend went to the canteen of our school, We were hungry so I gave some to my friend to buy some food from the canteen. He went there and asked the uncle for the foodstuff. He saw that the uncle was new in our school and It was his first day in our school. That Uncle was very old and therefore he wasn't able to remember things clearly, Canteen was crowded and uncle wasn't able to handle that crowd but still, he was trying. While my friend was buying food, suddenly a girl came and started asking for her stuff. Uncle was busy giving her the demanded things, therefore, he forgot to take money from my friend. My friend took advantage of it and went back without giving him the money. He came to me and gave me the food along with the money. I was confused that how he got food without giving the money. He told everything to me and was laughing at the point. I turned really sad as well as angry at his dishonesty. I didn't expect this from him, I went back to the canteen and gave the money to that Uncle and said sorry to him. Then I told my friend that I thought that he was very good and honest but after this, I can say that I was completely wrong at that point. I'm feeling very sad now because he was a very good friend of mine, but because of his dishonesty I cannot be his friend anymore, I used to think wrong about him but now I have known everything. I'm feeling good as well because I'm not a friend of a dishonest person anymore.

Yours Truly,

[Your Name]

3 0

3 years ago

Where is a good place to start when trying to figure out what you need to know about a topic or an event?

vovikov84 [41]

I think D

.........................v

.................................

................................

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which line from the passage could be used to support the inference that black oak acorns take longer to develop?

masya89 [10]

B, it tells how long the tree takes to grow
or
c, this answer tells how long the acorns take to grow therefore making half-grown acorns

8 0

3 years ago

Can some one for me answer these questions and give me the number of the bible please. please help

yawa3891 [41]

1- Jacob's twin brother's name was Esau. Genesis 25:25

2- When Esau returned from the fields, famished, he asked Jacob for food. Jacob offered to give Esau a bowl of stew in exchange for his birthright and Esau accepted. Genesis 25:29-34

3- Isaak was a blind, old man. When he felt he was dying he asked Esau to prepare him a savory food so that he could eat and give him his blessing. His wife, Rebecca, overheard him and told Jacob to pretend to be his brother. He dressed with Esau's clothes and puts lamb skin on his arms to imitate his brother's body hair. Then Jacon took Isaak a dish made by his mother and tricked him into giving him his blessing. Genesis 27:1-29

4- I believe Jacob's decision is immoral because he plots with his mother to deceit his father into giving him a blessing that was meant to be for his brother.

5- At Bethel, Jacob dreamed about a stairway resting on the earth, with its top reaching to heaven, and the angels of God were ascending and descending on it. At the top of the stair was the Lord, who told Jacob that he would give him and his offspring the land in which he is lying. Genesis 28:10-15

6- Jacob's wives name's were Leah and Rachel. Of the two, he loved Rachel more. Genesis 29:16

7- In order to marry Rachel, Jacob made a deal with her father, Laban, by which Jacob had to work for him for seven years. My opinion on this deal is that Rachel should have been the one deciding whether she wanted to marry Jacob or not. Genesis 29:18

8- Laban tricked Jacob by marrying him to his oldest daughter Leah. Since she was vailed, Jacob did not realized the two sisters had been exchanged. In order to finally marry Rachel, Jacob had to agree to work for an extra seven years. Genesis 29:21-30

9- Jacob striked a deal with Laban by which Laban would take all the colored or spotted sheep and Jacob would keep all the pure white ones. However, Jacob would get to keep all colored or spotted sheeps that were born from his own white sheeps. Laban believed this to be impossible, so he agreed eagerly.

However, Jacob took fresh rods of poplar and almond and plane trees, and peeled white stripes in them, exposing the white which was in the rods. He set the rods which he had peeled in fron of the flock's water source; the sheep mated when they came to drink, causing the birthed ones to be striped, speckled, and spotted. Genesis 30:25-43

6 0

4 years ago